《闹鬼的旅馆房间》影评

闹鬼的旅馆房间影评

见龙
2021/1/16 23:56:46
老爷保号vs一指团体
老爷保号的意思是神仙保佑。老爷就是潮汕地区的神仙，包括各种各样的神仙，常见的有地主爷，伯公，妈祖，三山国王等等。保佑的潮汕拼音为bo2 ho7，所以俗写为号。老爷保号在本片中另一个意思就是该说唱团体的名字，现实中该团体的名字是一指团体。本片的类型类似于刚刚上映的温暖的抱抱，音乐选秀加喜剧，从观感上来看，地方剧明显与成熟的团体有很大的差距，剧情节奏搞笑还有待提高，可以媲美的是歌曲部分。此次歌曲
老爷保号的意思是神仙保佑。老爷就是潮汕地区的神仙，包括各种各样的神仙，常见的有地主爷，伯公，妈祖，三山国王等等。保佑的潮汕拼音为bo2 ho7，所以俗写为号。老爷保号在本片中另一个意思就是该说唱团体的名字，现实中该团体的名字是一指团体。本片的类型类似于刚刚上映的温暖的抱抱，音乐选秀加喜剧，从观感上来看，地方剧明显与成熟的团体有很大的差距，剧情节奏搞笑还有待提高，可以媲美的是歌曲部分。此次歌曲由一指团体亲自操刀开始的《语潮》，和结尾的《海墘个孥仔2019》是老歌，中间的两首是为本片专门创作。特别是决赛歌曲与潮剧相结合很有新意，有点一指团体当年巅峰的创作味道，如同与宋亦乐合作的《日落后》，赵曙光合作的《夏雨再来》。虽说近年来一指团体近年来也有创作普通话歌曲和潮语说唱，笔者还是喜欢其早年的潮语说唱。一指团体的阿哲在剧中开始就客串角色，香菇在结尾决赛也露脸，都是作为老爷保号的对手出现。该片是以一指团体原型创作，不清楚香菇和叶子的爱情故事是不是也像剧中这么浪漫，是不是演绎的《汕头爱情故事》，一指团体的新老成员像不像剧中的《兄弟》。
【详细】
13143474
是诺曼底号啊
2018/1/22 19:46:00
故事较弱特效好看的奇幻片
暑假和小伙伴一起去看的特效真的真的太美了
超级赏心悦目因为没有期待已经就没有失望女主和男主有让人出戏的地方也有让人入戏的地方同影片里面大家都完成了自己的任务曾看过女主的太子妃里面的她超级美凄美决绝的美其中太子妃里面有几幕我让我看哭了电影里女主有几幕被美到了
但是服装实在拖后腿了使女主看起来臃肿不堪 ??也超大影片里的大陆真的超级中二超级嫩超级傻里
暑假和小伙伴一起去看的特效真的真的太美了
超级赏心悦目因为没有期待已经就没有失望女主和男主有让人出戏的地方也有让人入戏的地方同影片里面大家都完成了自己的任务曾看过女主的太子妃里面的她超级美凄美决绝的美其中太子妃里面有几幕我让我看哭了电影里女主有几幕被美到了
但是服装实在拖后腿了使女主看起来臃肿不堪 ??也超大影片里的大陆真的超级中二超级嫩超级傻里面大陆的台湾腔增加不少笑感影片的故事性同捉妖记相比稍微差了点台词也差了点主演的演绎也差了点影片里面有一些成人色彩的地方我觉得是最大的败笔尤其是女主穿红衣那里??但是特效真的真的好美总结: 特效不错的奇幻爆米花电影
【详细】
9095316
容叮叮叮叮
2020/9/5 20:01:12
三观很正，男女主颜艺在线的爆米花电影
这篇影评可能有剧透女主好灵（长相和演技两方面撑起来的灵），以至于她恋爱脑的时候我也能共情，一面无语“妹妹你别犯傻”，一面感叹“宝贝你傻起来也可爱”。（朱圣祎，是叫朱圣祎吧？关注了）施法时轻盈漂亮得像个不染尘埃的懵懂精灵（我一向不喜欢傻白甜女主，但她我i了），落泪陈情时滴滴痛...
这篇影评可能有剧透女主好灵（长相和演技两方面撑起来的灵），以至于她恋爱脑的时候我也能共情，一面无语“妹妹你别犯傻”，一面感叹“宝贝你傻起来也可爱”。（朱圣祎，是叫朱圣祎吧？关注了）施法时轻盈漂亮得像个不染尘埃的懵懂精灵（我一向不喜欢傻白甜女主，但她我i了），落泪陈情时滴滴痛... (展开)
【详细】
12850253
何木木
2017/6/22 3:05:20
第一次这么敏锐的观察到：我认为小云雀才是大boss
刘青云最后烧掉江一燕的纸条是因为什么？不就是因为江一燕为他建立起的理念崩塌了吗？好人变坏了，可是坏人并没有变好，他知道了小云雀杨幂才是大boss，却又奈何不得。谢霆锋自杀前为什么想到对小云雀说的话：只要我活着，就一定会保护你？事实上他是以自己的死亡为代价替小云雀做最后的也是最最终极的保护。电影剧情一开始就说了，他想到的最完美的犯罪其实是找人顶包，而谢霆锋就是这么干的。仔细想，他为了他所谓的公
刘青云最后烧掉江一燕的纸条是因为什么？不就是因为江一燕为他建立起的理念崩塌了吗？好人变坏了，可是坏人并没有变好，他知道了小云雀杨幂才是大boss，却又奈何不得。谢霆锋自杀前为什么想到对小云雀说的话：只要我活着，就一定会保护你？事实上他是以自己的死亡为代价替小云雀做最后的也是最最终极的保护。电影剧情一开始就说了，他想到的最完美的犯罪其实是找人顶包，而谢霆锋就是这么干的。仔细想，他为了他所谓的公义，已经杀了那么多人了，也不差刘青云一个了，作为最快的枪手，杀死刘青云不是什么难事。可是他选择了自杀，目的就是防止案件被继续调查。刘青云不能死，反而利用他，证明自己才是凶手，才是最正确的。参考白夜行桐原用自己的死保护女主，嫌疑人x的献身石神同样是顶罪入狱，乃至唐人街探案继父同样是以跳楼自杀，让女儿逃之夭夭。这样看来，最完美的犯罪的确是找人顶包。
这样看来，杨幂一角的存在不但不是败笔，反而让作品晋级于足以与白夜行相提并论的神作。那么再回首，很多都足以解释了，床戏前的对话不再无聊而是伏笔。刘青云第一次见面就称赞杨幂也是点睛之笔…………
【详细】
8618478
日出印象
2021/8/20 21:34:37
从老版《敌营十八年》谈早期电视剧创作
现在我偶尔也会看看老剧。偶尔看，主要是怕连续剧集数长、看起来太耽误时间。
不过和有些老影迷不一样，我倒是经常诧异：自己是不是在叶龙好龙？先声明,鄙人可从来不姓叶
就跟看过的许多老剧一样，怀旧到底是怀旧。
现在我偶尔也会看看老剧。偶尔看，主要是怕连续剧集数长、看起来太耽误时间。
不过和有些老影迷不一样，我倒是经常诧异：自己是不是在叶龙好龙？先声明,鄙人可从来不姓叶
就跟看过的许多老剧一样，怀旧到底是怀旧。其实要是回过头真正看起来，81版《敌营十八年》自己未必就一定喜欢。
新版《敌营十八年》播映以后，乘兴看过几次81版的《敌营十八年》。也许是离开了过去的生活环境、也许是审美不同，确实是看不进去。一般都是短短地看上一集半集，没有定力很难坚持下来。
老版《敌营十八年》故事情节简单划一、剧中人物表演粗糙，让人无法适应。剧情拖沓、节奏缓慢，更是使观众无心恋战。我觉得更主要的还是当年有些电视剧创作始终走不出——人物脸谱化、行为定型化、剧情程式化、思想政治化、台词戏剧化的套路，这些都大大降低了现在的电视观众欣赏老电视剧的观感。
毕竟《敌营十八年》拍得还是太早，在当时也是一种大胆的尝试。很难兼顾与时俱进的艺术魅力和隽永之美。81年第一次看、当时有得看就已经很不错了。到了后来拍摄的84版《四世同堂》、86版《包公》，我就经常赞不绝口。
相比之下同时期拍摄的电影作品，就非常喜闻乐见、受人欢迎。除了题材上推陈出新、百花齐放之外，新中国的电影工作者们也早已经积累了相当丰富的电影工作经验和成熟的摄制技巧。一旦在政治上获得新生又重新焕发出艺术青春，拍摄的影片也往往使人赏心悦目。
另外，也要考虑到电视剧的特质。电视剧时间跨度太、镜头多、画面不够讲究不够鲜明。戏剧冲突也不能像电影银幕上那样高度集中、矛盾尖锐。另外在当时的条件下，电视剧拍摄制作的成本也远远赶不上各大制片厂的影片投入。70末80初的中国电视剧荧屏，可以说因陋就简、白手起家。
可以说在81版《敌营十八年》当中，早期电视工作者也倾注了很多心血和汗水。那样的年代和那样的热忱，始终值得观众们缅怀。
【详细】

13812

1082

Jean

2005/11/22 13:54:43

A Choice

This is the harrowing story of a (not quite) typical mule: Maria Alvarez (Moreno), an intelligent and fiercely independent 17-year-old girl from Colombia who agrees to smuggle a half-kilo of heroin into the United States.

Walking out of the theatre, I found myself at a loss of words.

What struck me the most about the story was how un-exaggerate everything was. Let it be Maria’s job, her village, or her family. They were portrayed with moderation and care. The result was impressively real and honest. Maria’s job was not uncommon for a third world country’s village girl of 17. I’ve read far worse treatment and horror stories of factory workers in ShenZheng, China. The real evil was in the lack of a choice. All Maria had was the job in the flower factory. It was the only economic opportunity presented to Maria. It was what her family, even her entire village depended on. Sounds familiar? I thought of that British mining town in Billy Elliot.

Like all country girls who rebelled against their fate, Maria made a choice, the same choice all country girls in her shoes made, to go to the city. On her way, she was tempted away from the possibility of becoming a rich family’s maid; instead, she was offered an adventure. Traveling, America, and American dollars added together proven to be too big a temptation to turn down for a rebellious country girl. Was there really a huge difference for her, between pulling thorns off roses and swallowing cocaine pellets and carried them to America? Both were rich people’s merchandises, both were beyond her reach. She was one little link in the economy chain. The latter sounded a lot more exciting than the former, and it would take her beyond the depressing village outside of Bogota. She was, finally, presented a choice.

The subsequent story made me admire Maria’s intelligence and coolness. But it also chilled me to the bone to see how cruel and brutal the drug world was (is).

Would legalizing drugs clean up all these brutality? Would legalizing drugs prevent Maria and her fellow Columbian women from participating in this dark and ugly trade?

If so, then why wouldn’t any country take that step?

“Because drugs are evil and hurt people who use them. How could you legalize something so damaging to our very selves? How could any government give out any signal that drug abuse is ‘legal’, therefore, ‘ok’?”

Because not legalizing it made it worse? Because the huge profit margin is driving the drug trade into a frenzy, and it is killing poor people like Maria left and right? Cigarette is legal, isn’t it? It is harmful to people’s health, too. Why is that okay to endorse but not drugs? Since when human being became such innocent creatures?

“If you legalize drugs, then more people will become drug addicts. That would be disastrous and self-destructive.”

Okay. People have self-destructive tendencies. There are evils in these world, too many. People always have the choice of whether to become drug addicts, just like people have the choice of whether to smoke a cigarette. Are you saying that government has the right to make the choice for its citizens that the government knows what is best? What about education? What about the fittest survive? It is not like I don’t get drug offered when I walk down Telegraph Ave. in Berkeley, it is not like high school kids don’t get drug offers in parties, at playground, on their way to school, anyways. It is happening right now. How much worse could it get? Besides, once it became legal, it could take away the “adventurous lure” it has right now to the rebellious type. Couldn’t it?

Drug abuse is part of modern societies already. We have to deal with it. But if legalizing it could take away the huge profit for the drug lord, then it could reduce their incentive to produce them. It could dry up so many money sources for terrorist groups and anti-government organizations. It could save Maria and girls like her the fate of dying on ruptured cocaine pellets that they carry in their stomach. It could save them from being treated like animals (”mule”), whose stomach was cut open so their cargo could be retrieved. Mule’s life was of no consequence. The dehumanization of Maria and her fellow mules was not caused by drug’s own evil-ness directly. It was made possible by the huge profit of drug trade, and its huge profit came from their illegal status. It was made possible because of human being’s own greed.

If government wants to do good to the society, then it could place the choice into everyone’s own hand. Take away the possibility to make people even more greedy than they already are. Don’t tempt them. Trust them.

In Chinese modern history, there was a much revered national hero, General Lin Zexu. Who initiate the fight against the British in 1840’s. He burned all the opium he could gather in a huge public display. His angry words are still recited in today’s Chinese elementary school classrooms, “Opium is evil, it weakened our people, our soldier, our country…” But the fact was, Chinese society was weakened from inside before opium even appeared. The closed society has been quietly rotten away from top to bottom for centuries. There was little outlet for real talent of the society. There wasn’t much progress happeneing for the society as a whole. Corruptions were prevalent. Opium provided an escape. A dying plant happened upon a killer disease. It was easy to blame the disease. Even though General Lin Zexu won his opium war, the final treaty between the British and the Qin Dynasty turned out to be the first of many humiliating treaties to come in China’s Modern History. Burning Opium didn’t help General Lin’s cause. Burning the entire country might. That was exactly what Chairman Mao tried over a century later.

There is a little analogy in gardening. When a flower attracted diseases, it was often because the plant itself was weak and unhealthy, either from lack of water, light, or too much water, etcetera. To prevent disease from happening, you either make the plant strong and healthy, or you try to shut down all disease sources. The latter has proven to be a harder path. Shutting down flow of air would usually cause more problems to the plant. Exposing the plant to the natural elements was usually more healthy for the plant. As long as the plant was healthy, often it could fight off many diseases using its own strength.