6165201
  • 2018/8/19 22:29:47
    橄榄球初级球迷来说几句

    1.最后打巨人队那场为何会有多人tackle 未持球的Vince 的镜头……这是犯规吧……(认真)

    2.对教练的人物刻画太少了,有种想写又草草带过的感觉,明明可以往伯乐的形象上多描写一点

    3.橄榄球是一项团队运动,但是这里好像对Vince 个人的描写太多了,任何时候赢球都不是个人所致的,但是电影中几乎没有对team的刻画,最后比赛队友莫名其妙就从之前的排挤到接纳Vin

    1.最后打巨人队那场为何会有多人tackle 未持球的Vince 的镜头……这是犯规吧……(认真)

    2.对教练的人物刻画太少了,有种想写又草草带过的感觉,明明可以往伯乐的形象上多描写一点

    3.橄榄球是一项团队运动,但是这里好像对Vince 个人的描写太多了,任何时候赢球都不是个人所致的,但是电影中几乎没有对team的刻画,最后比赛队友莫名其妙就从之前的排挤到接纳Vince 了,感觉十分突兀

    【详细】
    9603215
  • 123
    2020/5/27 14:32:20
    LOVE POEM

    Does filming oneself and one’s own partner acting as non-professional actors equal documentary filming? Does exhibiting the process of fiction-making, or the making-of of fiction, equ

    Does filming oneself and one’s own partner acting as non-professional actors equal documentary filming? Does exhibiting the process of fiction-making, or the making-of of fiction, equal non-fiction cinema? What if the non-professional acting finally gets an influence of your daily non-acting? Is reality also the result of our exercises in fictionalising reality? If two non-professional actors say that they stop acting when the camera continues to record, did they “really” stop acting? Is any exhibited making-of of a film, even the making-of of the making-of of the film, potentially fictional? Would the fictionality of the making-of be more real than the reality of the fiction which the making-of refers to? What if a dying man or a two year-old child participate in an explicitly staged fiction? Can they be prepared enough, manipulated enough, in order to not bring some non-fictional reality into fiction? If the explicitly staged fiction displays the drama of a non-professional actress being manipulated by the rules of acting, does this mean that the non-professional actress is less manipulated, in reality, because she accepts being manipulated in order to express through her acting how bad it would be to be a manipulated non-professional actress? Does a meta-cinematic reflection rise when we realise that the ethical questions discussed in the drama coincide with the classical ethical questions of documentary filmmaking, like the question of filming and, in a way, seeking for suffering? If the pact between the non-professional actors would be to perform their own real life, would the non-scripted moments of improvisation go beyond the limit of their acting domain and show an effective non-fiction? Which should be the position of the spectator when, the explicit ambiguity between fiction and non-fiction notwithstanding, the highly credible dialogues make us suspend our disbeliefs? Should we resist the suspension of disbelief only because the realistic dialogue of a couple stops at once with the couple revealing their acting? When the non-professional actors, a couple themselves, start then to behave as if in their acting performances, should their previous dialogues be taken as even more credible or even more staged?

    All these questions arose in me during the viewing of Xiaozhen Wang’s two-hours long Love Poem. Even if the film is not devoid of genuinely dramatic moments, which we experience when we surrender to the cinematic suspension of disbelief, its main filmic experience coincides with our own intellectual inquiry on fiction and non-fiction. The climax of the interlocking layers of fiction and non-fiction comes in the last scene of the film, where the filmmaker takes the initiative to stop the camera, but this scene will confirm the impossibility of attempting to disentangle fiction and non-fiction. Then music will appear. Yes, Love Poem is mainly intellectual cinema, and I cannot but immediately add: so what? For in speaking of “intellectual cinema”, I already feel the pressure, today, of having to defend its legitimate existence against the anti-intellectualism that seems to loom among film scholars and cinephiles… Cinema has told, tells, and will always tell the story of the reflection on its own dispositive and fundamental issues.

    Text: Giuseppe Di Salvatore

    First published: April 26, 2020

    Love Poem | Film | Xiaozhen Wang | CHN-Hong Kong-SAR 2020 | 114’ | Visions du Réel 2020, Burning Lights

    More Info

    【详细】
    126244095
  • 梦里诗书
    2016/4/20 16:24:52
    烂兄烂弟
    文/梦里诗书

      香港喜剧电影的没落早已是一个不争的事实,究其根源正是例如有着如《刑警兄弟》这般全然不重任何剧情逻辑,只道装疯卖傻隔靴挠痒的闹剧,电影剧情的低能简直让人尴尬到狗血不堪,令人不忍直视。

      刑警搭档不同性格所营造的包袱笑料,这一元素早以在好莱坞电影例如成龙《尖峰时刻》中被玩转到烂俗,题材的苍白令电影在伊始就以是了无自身的着点,而在人物塑造上,同为单亲家庭的
    文/梦里诗书

      香港喜剧电影的没落早已是一个不争的事实,究其根源正是例如有着如《刑警兄弟》这般全然不重任何剧情逻辑,只道装疯卖傻隔靴挠痒的闹剧,电影剧情的低能简直让人尴尬到狗血不堪,令人不忍直视。

      刑警搭档不同性格所营造的包袱笑料,这一元素早以在好莱坞电影例如成龙《尖峰时刻》中被玩转到烂俗,题材的苍白令电影在伊始就以是了无自身的着点,而在人物塑造上,同为单亲家庭的警员,父母又突然相恋的所谓幽默,实则只令人所见电影一味只注重生硬刻意的荒诞营造,却始终未能真正塑造出哪怕一丝能接住地气的逻辑性,更不谈那假以刑警的无脑破案,这无疑始故事从头至尾根本无从入戏,而其后乍看密集的包袱,更满是刻意的疯傻。

      温情的情感牌一直是港片所给予的沉淀,《刑警兄弟》情感上随力图塑造兄弟间的金兰之谊与家爱情庭的羁绊,但这种情感的缔结,直到剧终亦始终无法为人感怀,究其根源无异于本自真情实感的兄弟与爱情在电影中透过黄宗泽与金刚两位主演的演绎唯觉虚假做作,这样的作品或许能昙花一现于上世界的香港,但今日这种在做作中填充情感,在狗血里营造温情的手法,已然不可能再博人欢颜。

      以刑警为名,其所演绎的简直就是对“刑警”二字的讽刺,以兄弟为引,实则为人印象深刻的只是那夸张的装疯卖傻,如此作品,最终为人所见的只是一对烂兄烂弟。
    【详细】
    7860586
  • sitemap