我看过很多刑警类型的电视剧！对这类剧，还蛮宽的只要有破案就蛮好看！但是这部剧，再刷新着三观！说着叫法医，开始整部剧仿佛和法医一点关系都没有！剧情上这边的太过于"神"话，女主就仿佛这部剧的"神"一样，所有的推理最后都成立！最可笑的是还需要一直站在以女主的角度为第三人称上去毫无根据的推理一番！但是，别忘了，这是个法医剧！法医最重要的职责难道不是可以让死人说话嘛？可是，这部剧女主是一点法医职责都没做，反而做的都是刑警该做的事！最可笑的是，女主很牛批的一个人去找嫌疑人对质，最后还立了功？？？真的太可笑了吧！然后就是电影的细节↓这个图是，某死者的遗骨吧，然后呢？仔细看图可以清晰的看到骨头中间的塑料感，如果你要说，这就是假的，道具，拍电视剧！但是我想说确实他是假的，难道不要极力的还原一下嘛？那如果为了省事，直接马赛克上去写个骨头不就好了！拍电视剧难道不要吉利求精嘛？那如果不这样为什么还要许多导演要力求还原呢？这就说明这部剧不够细致，也不够认真！然后就是演员的问题上，这个女主演的时候全程很尬，然后脸也有点僵！显得整部剧很死板！随说这部剧剧本不是很好！拿着时候更应该考验演员演技的时候，可是...一言难尽！

【详细】

13143714

古装校园题材微短剧《谷远山上有书院》今日开播。女主吴芄芄（王雅佳 饰）是现代化学专业的大学生，因为操作失误造成爆炸，竟然意外打开时空大门，穿越到古代定西大将军之女吴芄芄（王雅佳 饰）身上。自认很了解穿越原理的吴芄芄，以为再制造一次爆炸就能穿越回现代。于是用吴皖成的身份来到谷远书院，一方面给自己找个可以吃住的地方，一方面寻找制造炸药的原材料和场所。

【详细】

14845390

虽然有演绎的成份，但是Ruth在法庭上这段论述太给力了，看哭我。

Radical social change!

When I was in law school, there was no women’s bathroom, It is amazing to me now that we never complained. Not because we were timid, we were just astounded to be in law school at all.

据自己的例子说明社会其实一直在进步。以前有多落后你们都无法想象。现在我们有多落后，未来的人肯定也无法想象。

A hundred years ago, Myra Bradwell wanted to be a lawyer. She had fulfilled the requirements for the lllinois bar but she was not allowed to P-ractice because she was a woman. An injustice she asked the Supreme Court to correct. Lllinon’s was to confident of victory, they did not even send a lawyer to argue their side. They were right, she lost. That was the first time someone went to court to challenge his or her prescribed gender role. A hundred years ago.

Radical social change.

65years ago, when women in Oregon wanted to work overtime and make more money as men could, the court looked to the precedent in Bradwell and said no. So then there were two precedents. Then three, then four, and so on. And you can draw a direct line from Myra Bradwell to Gwendolyn Hoyt, told then 10 years ago, she was not entitled to a jury of her peers. That is the legacy the government asks you to uphold today. You are being urged to protect the culture and traditions and morality of an America that no longer exists.

A generation ago, my students would have been arrested for indecency for wearing the clothes that they do. Years ago I would not have the right to stand before you. There are 178 laws that differentiate on the basis of sex . Count them. The government did the favor of compiling them for you and while you are at it. I urge you to read them. They are abstacles to our children’s aspirations.

反驳对方律师关于现状是天经地义的，不是，它是一个个错误累积的。

You are asking us to overturn a century of precedent?

I am asking you to set a new precedent as courts have done before when the law is outdated.

淡定，法官，我不是让你颠覆历史，你也太不自量力了，我是让你创造一个新的因为法律已经过时了。

But in those cases, the courts had a clear constitutional handle. The world women dose not appear even in the US Constitution.

Not does the word freedom, your honor.

Go on.....

Professor Ginsburg.

The principal purpose of Section 214 is not to protect women not to discriminate against men. It is to provide caregivers the opportunity to work out side the home. Therefore as the Supreme Court did in Levy V Louisiana, this court should fix the law most in line with the legislate intent. Extend the deduction to never married men. Help all caregivers equally.

重申此案所设法条的目的

Charles Moritz was well-raised to be the sort of man we should all hope our sons will become Charlie deserves our admiration.

Not only was he taken on the burden of caring for his very strong willed mother, when no one would expect it of him but in doing so, he has surpassed the limitations the rest of us and our laws seek to force upon him.

针对对方律师对当事人的人格羞辱回应

We are not asking you to change the country, that is already happened without any courts’ permission. We are asking you to protect the right of the country to change.

我们只是让你们守护这个国家前进的权利。

Our sons and daughters are barred by law from opportunities based on assumptions about their abilities. How will they never disprove these assumptions if laws like Section 214 are allowed to stand?

We all must take these laws on, one by one, for as long as it takes, for their sakes, you have the power to set the precedent,that will get us started.

You can right this wrong.

我们不能任这种状况进行下去， 我们要为下一代创造一个更好的未来。修正错误。

We rest our case on our briefs and argument and ask that you reverse the tax court’s decision.

重申诉求完毕。

还有感动的点，就是电影里，Marty 得了癌症存活率只有5%， Ruth “we are never giving up. Keep working. Keep studying. Jane will have her father. And you will be a lawyer. I m spending my life with you, Martin Ginsberg ”

现在我自己疫情被困在国外， 每天忧心忡忡无心学习，整个生活步调都有被打乱的感觉，真的应该向Ruth学习， 就算要死了，我们也要保持原本的生活节奏，一切都会挺过去。

这个女人真的内心太强大了。又充满斗志与智慧。

还有Marty在安慰女儿的时候说：

“Grandma Celia died when Mom was about your age. But right up to her dying breath, they would read together, and debate ideas, and she d make mom question everything. Jane Mom isn’t bullying you. She doesn’t want you to feel small. She wants to share what her mother taught her. That s how she shows her heart.”

1993年RBG成为大法官之一，那一年我出生。

感谢你， 为我辈开创了一个新时代。

非常特别的一部片子，由于是真人真事改编，更觉得有一种特殊的感觉。很多人会拿这一部与浪潮相比。但因为一个是战争年代，一个是和平时期，我觉得还是有很大的不同。

战争里，大家都鬼使神差的有各人的打算。什么为了希特勒，为了祖国，都吹吧。逃兵们为了有一口饭吃，不再为自己的逃亡身份感到担心害怕；长官们为了赶紧清理掉逃犯们，不要浪费吃的喝的；甚至到了最后，法庭上的政治人物们也为了“弘扬”所谓的爱国精神，把一个令人发指的残暴杀人行径说成是爱国的错误表达方式。真真是黑白颠倒，荒谬绝伦。

大家都因为各自的目的而默认了上尉的身份，那这个上尉自己，又是为何？可能是穷途末路的疯狂，是自己惨遭追杀的愤恨报复，也是假借战争之名用暴力来宣泄自己战后痛苦的内心。无论是哪一种，都罪不可恕。

我不相信他们是天生恶魔，不如说，是战争机器下的怪胎。结局更是令人惊悚，当这些制服怪们走在现代化的社会里，一切却与历史如出一辙。多么的可笑，大家怕的，不过是一层皮。不，而是这层皮背后代表的强权，绝对权威。

一个深刻懂得反省并且毫不惧怕反省的国家，是可怕而强有力的。

情节硬伤让人忍不住想吐槽吐槽。

严重剧透++++++

每拍一次照片就死一个人简直可以说是死亡相机了。

从女主给水开始就想疯狂吐槽，又不是有剩余的情况下，六个人一瓶水还要给别人喝，别人喝完理所当然揣兜里竟然也不要回来？都这么大灾难了不去空屋捡物资反而要去挖山药？好嘛，一个山药差不多砍断挖出来得了，结果把自己爸给挖没了吧。非要上厕所，这种时候了不找个别人看不见的地方就行了非要往远处走，好嘛又没一个。这看的我简直要以为是不是灾难片错误示范了。

中间那段一直以为是邪教，没想到最后结果是美好寓意被疯狂打脸，直接给人整蒙了。

女主那个腿伤看的是真的难受，从第一集就在吐槽怎么还不包扎小心截肢结果最后真给截了就舒服了。海上飘着那段大叔莫名其妙死了之后还敢继续大开着拉链睡觉，这心大的简直没谁了。不过按理来说不是会尸体腐烂一段时间后才会引来动物分食么？为什么那么快就差不多了？

kite求救那段太有汤浅政明的风格了！全片最喜欢的场景一个是五人rap一个是春生跑步还有一个就是kite求救了。汤浅政明+好听的音乐+最后结尾的感人竟然让人忘记前面各种bug，私以为可以给到7分。

从片子剧情来说，流畅不拖拉，有矛盾点也有刺激点。从剪辑来说，不管是声音音乐来说画面连接都可圈可点。不过对于片子来说，我唯一觉得女主的演技让人频频出戏，给这部片子减分，所以说选演员对片子来说很重要。我就是学跆拳道的，很喜欢这部片子。外行人看热闹，内行人看门道。不懂的人在嬉闹崇拜中看完了，懂得人才知道，要做到秋楠这样得付出多大的努力。加油吧。