之前看风味人间的时候忘记记录下来看着心动的食物了。所以现在这算是一个开端吧，看记录片的时候用剧评来当做笔记本。 在B站上关注一个中国的在泰国的一个up在分享的她泰国男朋友做的菜，就看到了一些相似菜的做法，比如那个生肉多次捶打，说那是泰国北部的一个传统做法，想到...  (展开)

从一开始我就在猜最后会是谁，奈何片子格局本就不大，加上NPC一共也就那么六七个人，而且国际惯例，通过角色嘴说出的结局一般都是误导，所以最后完全在意料之中。
开篇的第一个场景还不错，把情绪调动起来了。中间有些断档，节奏看似紧凑，实际上故事却没怎么推进，纯靠场景和镜头一惊一乍，还不怎么吓人。
最不能忍的是，鬼不应该是玩法术的么，不是要靠远程输出、精神摧残什么的么，怎么能用物理攻击呢！！虽然我朝不能有鬼，最后都要科普的，但是前戏部分你还是得奔着真有鬼的样子去搞嘛~拿个锥子上去扎太有损鬼的风范了。

想起自己的爷爷，记得小学时候，有次跟他吵架，发脾气不想穿厚衣服，早上我没吃饭就跑去学校了，那天很冷，第二节课下课爷爷来了教室，我以为他是来骂我的，可是他只是给我带了包子，问我冷不冷，给我拿了衣服。这是我记忆里唯一一次跟爷爷吵架。以前爷爷在的时候，姑姑都不敢...  (展开)

这部电影开头的一段话是，如果你没看过《不死劫》、《分裂》将会影响观看本片的体验。事实是没看过前两部还不会显得这部如此鸡肋。 如果说《不死劫》是不错的调情，《分裂》是蛮享受的前戏，那么《玻璃先生》就是还没有高潮就结束的一次?体验。 他让你感觉好像超人正要飞翔...  (展开)

《大侦探皮卡丘》4分 我想起来了！这个剧本我看过！那个时候名字还叫“疯狂动物城” —————分割线————— 在我看来这其实就是一部非常平庸的电影，只要是好莱坞流水线产品看得稍微多一点还是不难看出这种老套的叙事是如何构成的，这部宝可梦的思路就和当年的“攻壳机...  (展开)

说实话第一次看到海报的时候我就很想看这部电影啊，看着海报上那一排黑西装大佬们，就好酷的样子，然而这部电影的海报，甚至电影名，都和电影的内容差的有点儿多。
故事简直简单平常，就是一个曾经放过特工的老爷爷，因为以前弄丢了自己的孙子，所以和家人关系不好，退休后就回到老家，一人生活，然后遇到一个小女孩，和那个小女孩特别投缘，也许是因为自己孙女。那女孩的爸爸又是个混混，所以女孩常来和特工爷爷作伴。我不知道这部电影想要表达的是对老人的陪伴还是爷孙情深的亲情，总之，整个电影在铺垫特工爷爷和这个没有血缘关系的孙女的感情上太差火候。整个剧情平淡的就如同徐克所领衔的那三位围观老者每日里无聊的生活一样，很难有情绪的波动。
当然，不得不说，有洪金宝的电影，打戏真是相当的出彩。他看似一个行动缓慢，记忆力退化，孤独度日的胖胖的老人，但是他一出手你就不由得想起，他曾经是一个特工，保护过很多重要的人物，过去的他一定是一位相当厉害的人吧，这样一对比，总感觉他如今的生活确实让人有些伤感吧，在中俄边境处的这座小城里，有这么一位人物，可是他不出手，又有谁知道他曾经的厉害。不胜唏嘘。
所以其实有两段戏我看的是有些泪目的，在赞叹洪金宝打戏真是看的特别过瘾的同时，也突然觉得他确实老了。电影里有一幕，他和黑道的那些人大打出手后，渐渐开始体力不支，大喘气，甚至大的冲击下开始脚步不稳，身手虽然还是那么利落，但是当看到他打完看起来特别累，不停大喘气时，不管是电影里面的安排还是他人的真实情况，这点真让人有人感慨啊。尤记得那些年看他们那一辈人的功夫戏，真功夫打出来那感觉和现在的是完全不一样的。
还有一幕是胖丁拖着不便的腿追黑道头头出去想追问小女孩的下落，可是那个黑道被杀后他伤心的坐在铁道上，有人来扶他起来，他哭着说他又把孙子丢了时，哪里还是被感染到了。以前所有的功绩也好，荣誉也好，于他来说都不及孙女在他心里的那份遗憾吧。
虽然被海报骗了，但是想说要是洪金宝他们没有老多好，功夫片他们那样的才看的爽呀。

这篇影评可能有剧透 中午去看了小虎墩，影片品质很高，工业化水平放在整体市场上都属于一流水准，笑点泪点结合得也很巧妙，总体来看是非常适合阖家观看的电影，推荐观看！！ 第一，故事主线内容和主角形象饱满，整体笑点泪点都恰到好处，看下来属于是看的时候还蛮开心。如果能有一些强记忆点或者增...  (展开)

在今天宫斗已经成为广大观众所熟悉的古装剧戏路，由于它涵盖了大量文化信息并且极度契合当下的职场生活，因而深受众多女性粉丝的喜爱。的确，在一个防火防盗防闺蜜的年代，这种后宫之间的翻云覆雨特别容易引起人们的共鸣，再加上职场生活中的各种尔虞我诈，宫斗几乎成为居家旅行职场修炼的必备良品。

眼下由李惠民、白云默执导的《多情江山》再次掀起了一股后宫热潮，或许这是继《甄环传》之后又一次对深宫怨女的全景式描绘，同时也为她们提供了新的竞技场。作为这个场域的核心成员，索尔娜（徐小飒）皇后一开始就是众人瞩目的焦点，当然在看似华丽的皇宫中她也成为众嫔妃攻击的第一目标。《易经》有言：“亢龙有悔”，身处高位如果能清醒地意识到自己的危险或许是保持地位的方法，然而来自草原的女儿索尔娜却根本不懂的如何保住后位。

其实就大清朝来说，一头一尾的两位皇后都挺有意思，同样都是托庇于姑母皇太后，同样不为皇帝丈夫所喜，只是索尔娜被废后降为静妃而消息于历史长河之中，而隆裕后来又以太后的身份柄国，虽然没有姑姑慈禧老佛爷的威风与心机，但好歹将国脉维持了三年。事实上这种内侄女的身份对于夫妻双方而言都是一种错位，皇太后与皇帝的关系除了亲情还有政治权力，对于一个从小就在母亲权威之下长大的孩子而言，无论是顺治还是光绪（尽管不是亲妈）都充满了逆反心理，在这方面顺治尤其憋屈的是还有个掌握大权与母亲不清不楚的摄政皇叔多尔衮，偏偏皇后就是多尔衮选定的，当然也是母亲布木布泰的意思，毕竟从娘家角度她也愿意皇后是自己人。

儿媳妇兼侄女的身份足以让索尔娜在皇太后面前加分甚至独宠，但在皇帝丈夫面前这些却都是减分的元素，因为越亲近老娘的老婆越让自己的威严受到冒犯。偏偏索尔娜对此一无所觉，凭借姑妈的宠信而跋扈六宫。故事一开始就展现了这个皇后的全部个性：凭借自己在后宫中的特殊地位而尽力炫耀身边的一切，稍有小挫折就发泄到身边太监宫女头上。

命运在给她显耀的权力地位时也造就了一颗傲娇的心，尽管就本质来说她还远谈不上坏。打死小太监的场面体现了徐飒对这一人物性格的掌控深度，就其本意她只想发泄手镯摔碎的懊恼，打小太监五十棍既是掩饰自己的失误也是寻找台阶，对于五十棍造成的后果也一无所知，就如当今在游戏中疯狂杀人的孩子，只是她这是现实版的游戏。面对掌刑太监要打死人的提醒，她的第一反映仍然是自己的权威与面子，如果减下八棍岂不显得自己言而无信？当真将小太监打死之后，其实她内心也是相当忐忑，当众杀人这样的戏码对于不到二十岁的小姑娘来说其实还相当震撼，但她却要强装镇定通过转移话题来使说服自己安心，也让手下老实。

其实只就这短短几分钟，我们就可以看到索尔娜的内心世界，她完全就是一个被宠大的孩子，既不知道下手的轻重也不明白后宫的险恶，而姑母皇太后又将其保护的过于安逸，根本不明白应该如何在后宫中生存。索尔娜的悲剧是注定的，徐飒将这一人物独特的内心体验展现的相当精彩，或许后宫本就不是她的生存场所，辽阔的草原才应该是她的归宿，她只是一个在错误的时间里出现在错误的地点的女孩。

石傲山，是横扫拳坛的拳王，是公认的金牌教练，不到十年成为商界强人。 ——“我不是想赢，我只是不服输” 不服输，是石傲山的标志。 少时艰难，救兄重伤，死里回生，始学泰拳，这是不服输的开始。 成为无人能敌的拳王，在生涯的最后一战却被使阴招，打折了黄金右手。但同样是...  (展开)

这篇影评可能有剧透 1. 就是披头士乐队粉丝线下聚会 + 圣地巡礼 + 卡拉OK的一次meetup。 2. 听歌要背歌词啊。很重要。 3. 做音乐真快乐，录着录着音突然随机加了个火车音效自然采样， 也挺美的。 4. John Lennon出现的一瞬间突然就开始真情实感的哭泣。 在电影创造的这个平行世界里他活到了78岁。...  (展开)

起标题无力啊。
上个月就看完了，拖到现在才写，感觉有点忘记了噻。
这部剧从最开始tvb定下大纲我就开始关注，期初的人物设定和最终呈现不同，蛮想看到黄德斌和田蕊妮的表演的，不过最后变成了KC，效果也很棒。
对于KC的演技，真的是很好，我认为是剧中的一大亮点，将正义的司徒舜塑造的有棱有角，剧中的穿衣风格和一些习惯动作的设计我都大爱，编剧对司徒舜的设定也很讨喜，正义、正直、聪明、果断、沉稳、关键是还那么帅，这样完美的男人不多见了。
杨怡的角色略有调戏，好像设定的有点傻白甜，还以为后期后成长为女强人，结果还是傻白甜到底了。而且前期超强记忆力的能力到了后期根本没发挥好嘛，是编剧忘记了嘛。
陈展鹏又演了一个反派，他的反派表情很到位，真的让人感到十分邪恶，甚至有些恨。只是前期没有觉得他最后会走上这样的歧途，在罪恶的道路上一去不复返了，剧情最这种转变的交待也不够，怎么突然一下就变得那个偏执那么邪恶呢。
林夏薇的角色蛮讨喜，长的也好看，哈哈。虽然差点成为第三者，虽然有时候查案智商也不太够，但是没有塑造成傻白甜，这就很成功。
高海宁的富二代背景交代不够啊，我还一直以为她的爹会是终极大boss呢。
刘江这么大犯罪集团，怎么一共就三个手下，一个韩晨，一个男枪手，这有点不合常理吧，简直大bug啊。
范飞，好吧，你又姓范。

整体来说，喜欢前半段，很吸引人，每天追着看更新。后段就弱了，很多不合理影响了剧评的发展。
最后，这部电视剧没怎么扣题啊，天眼体现的不够明显啊。

最后的最后，看完这部电视剧，真的喜欢上了司徒舜啊。

编剧你这么作妖，查水表的不知道吗？

读《孟尝君传》

 王安石

世皆称孟尝君能得士，士以故归之，而卒赖其力以脱于虎豹之秦。嗟乎！孟尝君特鸡鸣狗盗之雄耳，岂足以言得士？不然，擅齐之强，得一士焉，宜可以南面而制秦，尚何取鸡鸣狗盗之力哉？夫鸡鸣狗盗之出其门，此士之所以不至也。

This is the harrowing story of a (not quite) typical mule: Maria Alvarez (Moreno), an intelligent and fiercely independent 17-year-old girl from Colombia who agrees to smuggle a half-kilo of heroin into the United States.

Walking out of the theatre, I found myself at a loss of words.

What struck me the most about the story was how un-exaggerate everything was. Let it be Maria’s job, her village, or her family. They were portrayed with moderation and care. The result was impressively real and honest. Maria’s job was not uncommon for a third world country’s village girl of 17. I’ve read far worse treatment and horror stories of factory workers in ShenZheng, China. The real evil was in the lack of a choice. All Maria had was the job in the flower factory. It was the only economic opportunity presented to Maria. It was what her family, even her entire village depended on. Sounds familiar? I thought of that British mining town in Billy Elliot.

Like all country girls who rebelled against their fate, Maria made a choice, the same choice all country girls in her shoes made, to go to the city. On her way, she was tempted away from the possibility of becoming a rich family’s maid; instead, she was offered an adventure. Traveling, America, and American dollars added together proven to be too big a temptation to turn down for a rebellious country girl. Was there really a huge difference for her, between pulling thorns off roses and swallowing cocaine pellets and carried them to America? Both were rich people’s merchandises, both were beyond her reach. She was one little link in the economy chain. The latter sounded a lot more exciting than the former, and it would take her beyond the depressing village outside of Bogota. She was, finally, presented a choice.

The subsequent story made me admire Maria’s intelligence and coolness. But it also chilled me to the bone to see how cruel and brutal the drug world was (is).

Would legalizing drugs clean up all these brutality? Would legalizing drugs prevent Maria and her fellow Columbian women from participating in this dark and ugly trade?

If so, then why wouldn’t any country take that step?

“Because drugs are evil and hurt people who use them. How could you legalize something so damaging to our very selves? How could any government give out any signal that drug abuse is ‘legal’, therefore, ‘ok’?”

Because not legalizing it made it worse? Because the huge profit margin is driving the drug trade into a frenzy, and it is killing poor people like Maria left and right? Cigarette is legal, isn’t it? It is harmful to people’s health, too. Why is that okay to endorse but not drugs? Since when human being became such innocent creatures?

“If you legalize drugs, then more people will become drug addicts. That would be disastrous and self-destructive.”

Okay. People have self-destructive tendencies. There are evils in these world, too many. People always have the choice of whether to become drug addicts, just like people have the choice of whether to smoke a cigarette. Are you saying that government has the right to make the choice for its citizens that the government knows what is best? What about education? What about the fittest survive? It is not like I don’t get drug offered when I walk down Telegraph Ave. in Berkeley, it is not like high school kids don’t get drug offers in parties, at playground, on their way to school, anyways. It is happening right now. How much worse could it get? Besides, once it became legal, it could take away the “adventurous lure” it has right now to the rebellious type. Couldn’t it?

Drug abuse is part of modern societies already. We have to deal with it. But if legalizing it could take away the huge profit for the drug lord, then it could reduce their incentive to produce them. It could dry up so many money sources for terrorist groups and anti-government organizations. It could save Maria and girls like her the fate of dying on ruptured cocaine pellets that they carry in their stomach. It could save them from being treated like animals (”mule”), whose stomach was cut open so their cargo could be retrieved. Mule’s life was of no consequence. The dehumanization of Maria and her fellow mules was not caused by drug’s own evil-ness directly. It was made possible by the huge profit of drug trade, and its huge profit came from their illegal status. It was made possible because of human being’s own greed.

If government wants to do good to the society, then it could place the choice into everyone’s own hand. Take away the possibility to make people even more greedy than they already are. Don’t tempt them. Trust them.

In Chinese modern history, there was a much revered national hero, General Lin Zexu. Who initiate the fight against the British in 1840’s. He burned all the opium he could gather in a huge public display. His angry words are still recited in today’s Chinese elementary school classrooms, “Opium is evil, it weakened our people, our soldier, our country…” But the fact was, Chinese society was weakened from inside before opium even appeared. The closed society has been quietly rotten away from top to bottom for centuries. There was little outlet for real talent of the society. There wasn’t much progress happeneing for the society as a whole. Corruptions were prevalent. Opium provided an escape. A dying plant happened upon a killer disease. It was easy to blame the disease. Even though General Lin Zexu won his opium war, the final treaty between the British and the Qin Dynasty turned out to be the first of many humiliating treaties to come in China’s Modern History. Burning Opium didn’t help General Lin’s cause. Burning the entire country might. That was exactly what Chairman Mao tried over a century later.

There is a little analogy in gardening. When a flower attracted diseases, it was often because the plant itself was weak and unhealthy, either from lack of water, light, or too much water, etcetera. To prevent disease from happening, you either make the plant strong and healthy, or you try to shut down all disease sources. The latter has proven to be a harder path. Shutting down flow of air would usually cause more problems to the plant. Exposing the plant to the natural elements was usually more healthy for the plant. As long as the plant was healthy, often it could fight off many diseases using its own strength.