真的好看！入股不亏！

虽然感觉故事线有点薄弱，但是瑕不掩瑜，介绍了中国重工企业在时代洪流中的自救和发展。所有的改革背后都是数不尽的心酸与不易，是一代又一代人的努力。

之前对杨烁的印象还停留在《我是特种兵》里的三哥，《欢乐颂》里的小包总，最开始几集还有一些出戏，但是越到后面，卫丞的形象越发稳固。一个父母离异，父亲患了精神病的科研天才，他的生命里只有研究，还有为父亲找到真相治好父亲。这样环境下生长的人，这样一个不懂人情世故，不懂爱的人，注定他的性格是悲观的，他对生命缺少一种热情。

但是金燕子却是永远对生命充满希望，充满热情的人，这样的人对于卫丞而言是完全相反的，金燕子在雪山上救卫丞，或许换一个人金燕子依然也会救，但是这种行为是卫丞所无法理解的。而这种行为也触动了卫丞，他把苔藓留下来的时候在想什么呢？撒开手却又抓住的时候他又在想什么呢？

金燕子于卫丞而言，是一束光，一把火，能照亮他的黑暗，能带给他温暖，一个知识水平远不如他的人，为了他背会了圆周率的后100位，怎么能不心动呢？金燕子去相亲，卫丞明明吃醋，却不愿意说清楚，又因为金父的一番话生了退却之意，幸好卫父的开解，卫丞才下定决心。而这个情节中最打动我的是金燕子被卫丞说的话伤了心之后，又可以一边流泪，一边说吃醋就是喜欢，她没有在这份感情中退却。

剧中结局，两人在i5车间中，在工业机械的见证下完成了结婚仪式，钢铁的浪漫，我为之心动，也为之感动。剧中最后一幕定格在卫丞回头，有一眼万年的意味了。

虽然是献礼正剧，但我觉得两人的感情戏是整部剧中最动人的部分，两个截然相反的人，被对方逐渐吸引，理想主义的花朵最终盛开在现实主义的土壤里。

祝福金燕子和卫丞婚后生活幸福，一切美满。

一看简介，脑海中立刻蹦出一个电影《恋爱这件小事》，不过那部是女主扮丑，这部换成男主。风格类似，也不能说演的不好吧，好像比那部差点，但我本来就喜欢电视剧胜过电影，所以希望宋威龙多拍一些电视剧吧。这部电影男主也好腹黑哟，7岁就喜欢人家，十几年跟踪尾随，还设计两人念了同一所大学，我的天哪，这不是容止附身了吧！

期待很久的《怪异》终于开播，最爽的居然一下6集全出；导演更是由指导了Netflix前段时间爆火的深度惊悚悬疑漫改《地狱公使》的导演延相昊担任。

从剧集的节奏上，6集相当紧凑，毫不拖沓，集集都是干货；

在剧集的内容上，超现实的自然现象的解读基于“神秘的藏传佛教+韩国古代玄幻文学”结合，甚至要比爆火的《地狱公使》来得更清晰，悬疑但不空乏。

而且本剧集中，显然无法再回避大韩民国的祖先在“高丽王朝”、“李氏朝鲜”年代，与神州天朝的渊源，毕竟高丽王朝书面文字都是汉字，而李氏朝鲜也大量使用汉字（即使世宗大王发明了韩文，但在日常政务及民间也大量运用汉字，甚至新王登基都需要宗主国-天朝，给他们发诏书“任免”）。

基于这种对历史的真实描绘，让本来架空的“悬疑”、“惊悚”、“诡异”、“仙妖”等奇幻的组合在整部剧集中显得更加缜密合理，不像《地狱公使》，有的小红薯觉得没头、没脑、没尾。

剧集中应该是充分吸取了《地狱公使》的“失败教训”，没有太过深度的着重太多的大韩民国“政治经济文化历史”的“自黑”，只是点到即止，了解的观众能看到若隐若现的影子，不了解的观众也不会觉得迷糊（因为没占什么篇幅，只是个别画面和人物背景及性格）。

说了这么多废话，言归正传，说点干货，但不剧透——

故事起源于一个被挖出的奇异佛头雕像，挖出时石像的眼睛被写满密宗佛教藏文的经幡裹住了眼睛。

贪图名利的郡守（估计就是个乡长）为了展出佛头收门票，赚游客钱，不顾僧人的警告把封印取下，随后....内心的柔弱、恐惧、邪恶一一被引燃.....混乱开始，杀戮开始，灾难开始。

至于解决，既然是密宗藏经，那么可怜的大韩民国，作为藩王级别的存在，恐怕就没那么容易了，即使不求助天朝，也得在死亡线挣扎。

PS：1）剧集在很多细节上更是向希区柯克经典《群鸟》致敬，但是韩国的改编就是有思路，将“鸟灾”只作为一个环节，而最终还是指向了“佛头”。2）本剧其实从内涵的深刻性上，完全不亚于《地狱公使》，因为细节中对“大韩民国历史、现代社会、宗教、乃至警、政、军”的隐含述说都有反应，但为了一般观众被相应弱化压缩。

看了更新的4集，开始不太明白王梓为什么这么执着于陈默，觉得编剧应该是没怎么有悬疑剧的基础。看到陈默跟王梓正式见面就明白了，大概是在为过去的旧案做铺垫，算是一条隐线？总感觉后面还另有隐情。王梓一个富二代，也不能说是普通的富二代，。首先，从父亲在他幼年坐牢，留他一个人生活到现在就看得出来。他能好好长这么大，没变成反社会人格，而且还有能力打理一家公司，足以可见这个人有多聪明。对陈默来说，如果不是同一阵营，又会是多大的麻烦。王梓不惜布置这么久，甚至跟警察对着来，也要引诱陈默上钩，让陈默帮他。现阶段来看，他不像是陈默的敌人。还有一个点我很在意，就是摩托车飙车那里，王梓跟陈默见面后，指着自己的胸口的部位，说他“这”不太好，包括后面在审讯室里，王梓发病被救护车拉走。其实已经是心脏病石锤了吧？记得陈默师父的儿子也有心脏病。一部剧里同时出现一种病，不能说是巧合，总感觉这两者之间会有什么关联。总之很期待后面剧情的走向，希望下周能揭晓王梓究竟是好人还是“狼”。

For my own records.

1. Math, Calculus and counting

I never quite understood calculus until I heard someone put it this way, not the original words but the basic ideas: before calculus, we are doing measuring shapes of very conventional shapes, like squares, rectangles, triangles, we got all the simple formulas, mutilple by each sides etc. then how about irregular shapes, how do we calculate the areas? yes we do it by couting tiny unit squares inside whatever shapes, then sum the whole thing we got the area! does it sound familiar, yes its almost the idea of Riemann sum, which is the very foundation of calculus. of course things get messier and messier after introducing more shapes functions and extended everything into higher dimensions, like not only do we want to calculate area which is summation of 2D space, we also want to know the volume aka 3D space summation.

So, all i want to say is, calculus is mathmatical counting at a more general/complicated level, with calulus we count every fucking thing. This is in fact in line with the basic idea of math(or my personal very shallow idea of what math actually is), math is counting, of couse people will argue its more than that! but I insist, the very core idea of math is counting, and only after that do we have all the general summaries of truth or patterns discovered by counting numbers. then why do we count? because we need to measure. how do we measure? we measure by addition. we mearue length by counting all the unit dots in a line; we measure areas by adding unit lines together, imagine adding all unit dots in one line, then do it repeatly, which is how multiplying works; we measure volumes by adding areas together, which feels like an iteration of areas addition on top of an iteration of lines addition on top of an iteration of unit dots addition. how about 4th dimention then? another iteration on top of 3d measures.

Back to the idea, why do I talk about elementary computations that every kid knows? Because I want to conclude(feel free to disagree) that math is about counting, and finding patterns through counting. We use counting to measure/symbolize/understand world. I guess thats why peopel always say math is the closest to truth/nature/god etc.

2.logic and programming

Lets start with a basic question. What is computer? Its a machine which do computing just like its name! how does it do it? it does computations by fliping bits which is the basic unit of chips, by fliping massive amount of tiny bits in very short period of time, computers counting/computing/recording numbers. So again, what exactly does computer do? put it in a more abstract way, it does simulations of complicated computing procejures.

One word, simulations, it is what I want to describe the essence of computers in relation with the major topics I want to talk about here.These multi-stage simulations are carried out by a combination of computing numbers and logics simulations. Here I first mentioned logic. In mathmatics, logic has more rigorious definition, but I want to think it in a simple way, it is the glue to gluing numbers counting and stages of counting together.

So what is programming according to all my previous definitions of logic and computers? I think, programming is to create simulations of combinations of different countings and logics, though this whole process takes so many stages from a bit flip on the chips to high level programming abstractions like declare a variable.

3.to put it simple

To summarize, math is counting, programming is to create simulations of countings glued by logics. computer gives us tremendous amount of power to do all kinds of simulations, and by doing all these simulations we can find answers to specific questions, we can optimize answers, we can basically simulate/abstract/recreate the real world since we already tried to simulate everything.

4.why are we talking about all these abstract concepts?

The point is simulation.

We want to simulate everything in real world. and math, logic and programming are the tools we use to build all kinds of simulations. Essentially, we are recreating the real world in a digital/mathmatical/logical(simplified) way. When people are talking about AI, machine learning, all kinds of algorithms, and sounds crazy concepts like AI taking over the world, mind uploading, maybe all these could be viewed in a different way: they all are simulations of the real world. Then they are not so mind blowing after all, they are in fact the very logical progression of human civilazition, we are in fact heading towards another new world which is created by ourselves based on abstractions of the pyhsical world.

5.how does it relate to the movie?

The movie introduced very advanced concepts like AI master control program, human digitalized into computer simulated world, they look fictional, they sound unreal. However, they are in line with the directions we are heading to. And it is in some sense definitive. I personally believe they are achievable, people say si-fi predicts the future, I think si-fi draws blueprints for the future and we humans create the future based on it. Anyway, I think this movie was so advanced and still relating till this day, we are heading towards all the ideas this movie presented.

这个电影再次触及了韩朝的敏感话题，上一部让我感动得直流泪的是特工，这部虽然没有泪水，但给人更压抑，让情绪得不到释放。要说韩朝的问题强度甚于我们的T海问题，毕竟几十年都是刺刀顶刺刀，所以在处理矛盾时，两国也是用尽了朝鲜族的智慧，几十年来让其他大国为他们买单，一个成功拥有了核武，一个成为世界经济强国。从这点可以看出鲜族人的团结和狡诈，而本片也深刻的表现了这点。

但让人敬重的是韩国文化和电影的开放程度，一部又一部接触敏感领域，正因为对现实和历史的尊重，无论是失败还是胜利，韩国电影都选择直面。我以前是不看韩剧的，因为10几年前韩剧的影响，感觉太娘，但后来看了一系列的韩国犯罪电影后，发现韩国电影发展得越来越快，早就冲出亚洲了。再看我们的电影，前几年模仿韩罪片的几部还不错的，如暴雪将至那一类的，因为溶入了真实的90年代背景。再看其他的电影，根本感觉不是在真实的社会，而是在爱丽丝仙境和一系列晚会小品里，因为你感觉不到普通中国人的生活。

这个电影说了国家分裂之痛，但给人希望，人性战胜了意识形态，虽然不知道未来如何，可美好的东西得保持住，不能丢掉，这可能是2个国家共鸣的部分。中国擅长拍摄正面的电影，如80年代也有一系列反应台港同胞的电影，虽然略显夸张，但现在看来，感情朴素而真挚，那是发自内心对同胞的热爱，只是表现得比较稚嫩。我看来，中韩两国对分裂之苦的这类电影题材，其内在是诚恳的，这就是美好的东西，这就是不同地区的共鸣，得永远保留。