１.David Simon and Reporting

In my opinion,what makes The Wire so different and incredibly realistic can be largely attributed to David Simon,the former Baltimore Sun journalist and the producer of The Wire.Obviously his skills as an excellent reporter made great contribution to the highly-realistic series. He saw how Baltimore‘s various worlds worked──or didn’t──as a police reporter for the Sun.He ended up taking a buyout from the Sun in 1995.In Simon’s view,profit-driven media companies continue to degrade the quality of dozens of papers in major cities.Therefore he turned to make TV series,seeking another way of reporting.He once said in a interview that “Specialization and detailed beat reporting are the future,”he added that ”We are going to have to explain an increasingly complex world in ways that make us essential to an increasingly educated readership.The scope of coverage have to go deeper,address more of the world not less.”and he concluded that those were his ambitions.Clearly,newspapers is dying due to its anachronistic limits.News will not disappear,however,so does journalism.The ambition of journalists shouldn’t be betrayed and trashed.
I tend to think that The Wire is a perfect case of a new and in-depth reporting,in terms of journalistic ambition.What really make The Wire outstanding are the acute description of another America and the profound consideration behind it，which reveals how indifferent institutions and selfish
individuals often stand in the way of initiative，and how complicated and compelling the systems are.But the show’s great accomplishment is that it never preaches.Instead of rote lessons about urban decay,Simon’s conclusions arrive via meticulous character studies that rarely feel plotted or predictable.

２.Impact

The power of reporting lies in its influence on audience or citizens,providing accurate information and thus propelling social progression.As audience we are threw into the reality that The Wire has build,with bitter hatred and indignation,also with ambition to resolve those problems.“Measured against more thoughtful and meaningful occupations,a TV show is not the best seat from which to argue public policy or social justice.”David Simon said in an interview, “Still,those viewers care the fates of The Wire characters.They worry or grieve for Bubbles,Bodie or Wallace,certain that these characters are fictional yet knowing they are rooted in the reality of the other America,the one rarely acknowledged by anything so overt as a TV drama.”
We feel every one is responsible to make a difference. So what is the response of a “Wire” viewer──we want to make it better,what do we do? Simon said “Go for it”,and he continued to argue that we have to find that which we believe to be meaningful and exert. “There are just too many people who are chasing the buck.”

３.Another Way to Journalism

Maybe it is not proper to ascribe a fictitious drama to journalism.However,sometimes the truth comes from fictions.Just like no political report can equal the sway of 1984 by G.Orwell.Good pieces of art also have deep insights and what’s really counts is their power of moving audiences emotionally and alerting people in a unique way.
On the other hand,journalism is less and less of a curb.Journalism relies on people being generally and righteously outraged when it shows something injustice or unfair.But people now are less and less inclined to outrage about news.What people need is entertainment now.It’s harder to show why things are not working and to get at these macro issues and to do so using the acquisition of real facts and telling true stories.A combination of dramatic form and reality-based content is probably another way towards a better understanding of social issues,since it is entertaining and thought-provoking simultaneously.
What The Wire is saying is,here’s the way things actually breaking down on the street,here’s what’s not working,here are the lies you are being told,here’s what is real that nobody gives shit about.
And that’s exactly what a journalist want to tell people.