非常特别的一部片子，由于是真人真事改编，更觉得有一种特殊的感觉。很多人会拿这一部与浪潮相比。但因为一个是战争年代，一个是和平时期，我觉得还是有很大的不同。

战争里，大家都鬼使神差的有各人的打算。什么为了希特勒，为了祖国，都吹吧。逃兵们为了有一口饭吃，不再为自己的逃亡身份感到担心害怕；长官们为了赶紧清理掉逃犯们，不要浪费吃的喝的；甚至到了最后，法庭上的政治人物们也为了“弘扬”所谓的爱国精神，把一个令人发指的残暴杀人行径说成是爱国的错误表达方式。真真是黑白颠倒，荒谬绝伦。

大家都因为各自的目的而默认了上尉的身份，那这个上尉自己，又是为何？可能是穷途末路的疯狂，是自己惨遭追杀的愤恨报复，也是假借战争之名用暴力来宣泄自己战后痛苦的内心。无论是哪一种，都罪不可恕。

我不相信他们是天生恶魔，不如说，是战争机器下的怪胎。结局更是令人惊悚，当这些制服怪们走在现代化的社会里，一切却与历史如出一辙。多么的可笑，大家怕的，不过是一层皮。不，而是这层皮背后代表的强权，绝对权威。

一个深刻懂得反省并且毫不惧怕反省的国家，是可怕而强有力的。

男：卧槽泥马做援交！！！！？这种女人？？绿茶婊！！？

可夏树能称得上坏么？？

首先夏树是不是真心喜欢拓海？答案是肯定的、她对拓海的暧昧表现以及拒绝奔驰男、至少是喜欢他想要在一起的

其次夏树为什么做援交女？？？奔驰大叔找一个高中生做援交、谁更坏一点？成年大叔的性需求、造成了高中生卖淫。傻比会说夏树拿钱啊！！那么为什么夏树缺钱？？她妈妈为什么允许她做这样子的事情？她爸人呢？这样来说夏树更多的是可怜吧、家庭对她的伤害、以及奔驰大叔给她带来的羞耻让她今后的人生都不会容易。

最后拓海为什么抛下夏树？因为她做援交啊！当然不只是、而是他不够喜欢没有担当、他嫌弃夏树。他没有过问夏树为什么要这样做、不去了解夏树在怎样的生活、甚至没有给夏树说话的机会。只是简单的残忍的甩开、认为自己被欺骗自己是受害者。可真正的受害者是谁？

当然电影不是为了讲爱情、不会去铺开讲夏树经历了怎样的悲惨。夏树让我想到了雪穗、为什么日本作品中会经常出现这样“漂亮”的女孩子？可能是社会的投射可能是作家的意淫、总之是病态的。

the space between us, everything is so beautiful so real, I watched this while talking to u, you’re pretty much vulnerable, and I love u so much, I've never ever had a relationship experience like this. Finally, the main character came back to Mars, and I gonna go to another country, we don’t know when we can meet each other, again, but we do know, love gonna exist forever.

有宝宝说我看剧慢

没错，我不太注意剧的更新日期，大多数就图个快乐

最近让我时刻关注想追更新的剧

只有《消失的初恋》和《黑帮少爷爱上我》

但是《甜心派》的第三对副CP

如果cut出专属剧我一定狂追

两人颜值都好高，恋爱日常甜蜜又青涩

我觉得风头都盖过两对主CP了??

【详细】

14415666

06年那会逛天涯比较多，《鬼吹灯》算是惊鸿一瞥，但那会天涯的大神实在太多，论坛的更贴模式又着实太慢，所以终究是没追下来。

后来，天下霸唱把小说搬到了起点，算是赶上了起点最早期用户的爆发，加上这个题材在当初又算是稀缺，所以没过多久就爆了。再之后《鬼吹灯》开始出实体书，刚出书的时候我还买过几本，小说陆陆续续追了不少年，不敢说算是铁粉，但绝对算老粉一枚。

【详细】

14662390

昨晚用vr眼镜看完的，虽说是13年的电影可是特效仍然震撼，吊打国内某些高投入电影。后来看到大家说投入1.3亿美金，才知道特效是用钱堆出来的。

终于知道死侍的碎嘴原来是和监狱长（越狱）学的，监狱长那口音让我怀疑说的是不是英文。不过老少配的阵容还是不错的，尤其是t-bag那张猥琐的脸变成大嘴，真是让人印象深刻。

最后评价还是值得一看的爆米花电影，3d效果还行吧，还是得减持减肥，胖子真的好油腻。

Feel Good is a low budget 6-episode TV show which mysteriously skipped my attention when it was first brought up by a friend: probably because it features no big star (Lisa is one, but in a small role), and British TV shows like Fleabag and Killing Eve have raised the bar very high now.

However, one night, I started to watch the first episode and was very impressed. The not so sub plot of addiction is so well-written. I really like it when Mae (its main character shares the same name with the writer and lead actor, which is a bit confusing) expands the definition of ‘addiction’: ‘it’s all the same feelings, craving, and withdrawl, and relief, and obsession. We are just swapping one addiction for another’. By doing that, Mae Martin (I will use the full name when referring to the creator) connects the love story and Mae’s struggle to stay clean together. Mae Martin challenges the audience to view addiction as not only a struggle among a group of people, but something many of us face when being in a toxic relationship with partners, or, say, social media. By then, I am convinced Feel Good is quite good because the creators know ‘nuances’. Its focus on addiction also reminds me of Killing Eve S2, the key word for its 2nd season is ‘obsession’. While both handle compulsive/toxic feelings between people/people and object, Killing Eve’s take on obsession is disappointing, Feel Good, on the other hand, only gets better episode by episode.

Story aside, I am mesmerized by how the show introduces the love story to the audience. It is fast-paced. As Guardian remarks, ‘Feel Good moves so quickly and lightly that it seems impossible it could also be managing to construct characters and burrow into psyches as deeply and empathically as it does.’ You never need to fast-forward; it’s densely-packed but you won’t feel stressful; the plots mingle effortlessly. It takes 30 seconds for Mae and George to fall in love with each other. I love how unconventional and unapologetic it is. I love how an LGBTQIA (bless Joyce) story focus on how the two lovers enjoy their relationship (at least for the most part) without giving too much attention to how they are unsure if the other is into them, or suffering from loneliness because they can’t find a partner. Of course the loneliness issue exists and there is suffering, but there are many representations of those already. Feel Good shows how the relationship can be the start, rather than the ending, of a story.

I also like how the struggles of Mae and George are more about themselves making choices than them being in disagreement with a suffocating society. It is refreshing to see not only Mae’s parents, but George’s mother, support their sexuality. Mae’s gig pals don’t make a fuss about her having a girlfriend. The roommate Phil is an angel. The lead of the support group is a gay man; Lava is loved by her mother regardless of her sexuality. While Binky’s husband and his friends are ‘piece of shit’, I don’t see them as homophobic (I could be wrong though). The show demonstrates that everyone can and should be nice to LGBT+ community. I like how Feel Good doesn’t use societal approval as a trope; instead, it allows us to see Mae and George as individuals who make their own decisions. Yes, sexuality is and will be important in their lives, but they don’t let it to devour them, they can still breathe.

The relationship is beautifully written and wonderfully performed. I mean THE CHEMISTRY!! Yes there is sex. As Mae Martin said, she didn’t want the lesbian sex to be voyeuristic. I congratulate her in doing a fantastic job!! Feel Good has amazing sex scenes: they are romantic, witty, hilarious, and honest. The director and writers make sure the sex scenes are not about sex/lust only, they are also about female pleasure. Mae and George communicate and share their sexual preferences; they don’t force their fetish on the other, instead, they ask politely. The show doesn’t mystify lesbian sex: even lesbians can’t cum and that’s ok! Feel Good has achieved what Sex Education has done: it has educated people (older than high schoolers) how to have sex, and more importantly, how to discern when the relationship is going south.

There are nudity scenes and they are (quite literally) serving the plot: it is when Mae feels most vulnerable physically. The paradox of the physicality and the personality is, however, not restricted to gay people. Mae is struggling because she believes however hard she tries, she can never have George in the long haul because George is ‘culturally straight’. George, however, insists this idea is just in Mae’s head. (Or is it?) It becomes apparent that the couple is not on the same page on many things. Mae is shy but she wants public validation of their relationship: she wants to be blessed by George’s family and friends. George is popular (win the lottery) but she is ultra private when it comes to Mae. She points out her friends just want to crack a joke and emotions (mind, not sexuality), for them, is gross. Eventually, George will have to face her own real emotions. There is a moment where Mae questions why George never like/retweet her social media stuffs. As Fleabag says ‘Hair is everything’, the (non)usage of social media, I argue, is (almost) everything. This again shows the discrepancy between the couple – which, of course, is normal; in every relationship/friendship, such disagreements happen and that’s what makes this show so relatable.

It is interesting to note that the dynamic between the two flows all the time. I find myself on the side of Mae and then I am on George’s side! For example, the first episode shows Mae concealing her addiction history from George, which is a bit dishonest; but George also makes Mae think she’s already mentioned her to her friends while actually she’s dating some Crenshaw dude. I find it especially interesting that while George is portrayed as a cold person (she leaves Mae alone in a party; she’s rather cold towards Phil etc etc), Mae can also be quite aloof – check what she does to Lava. When she says let’s not share this with Maggie, it is as if George were saying let’s not tell my friends now.

Talking about George and her friends, I really like how the show does about their friendship. It shows that those friendships, even though ‘long haul’, are not necessarily genuine. Indeed, things can be tricky, if not scary, when friends finally choose to be honest with each other, right?

Binky’s husband and friends are hilarious characters, but the show makes sure not all the male characters are caricatured. I like Phil a lot; he’s giving me the neighbor who ended up marrying Hannah’s boyfriend’s sister in Girls, especially when he’s mentioning all the baby stuffs. Mae’s dad is a charming character; but I am not sure if he’s a good dad. His ‘Oh I need to check the garden’ is a specimen of dad type, who leaves all the dirty job of communicating with kids to mums. The show also inserts in a MeToo story plot where things turn sour quickly. In all, the portrayals of male characters are multifaceted. Well done.

Last but not the least: small roles. Does the show even have small roles? Because everyone shines. Even the shop assistant of that sex shop: the scene is so funny and captivating. Lisa Kudrow is funny but in a cold way – which is really nice. I am not crazy about her first appearance in the laptop; seeing her appear in Blackpool is a real surprise for me (and Mae). I love the scene in Ghost Train the most. Arguing in a horror house/moving train, with all the noise and terrifying man-makes while discussing ‘real emotions’, which is the most terrifying of all – what a genius idea!! The fact that the show keeps vague about why Mae is cast out of the family is an interesting one; I quite like how her mother points out her privilege and that she has everything she wants when she grows up. Again, the show is looking at the mysterious and intricate human mind that is not so easily explainable. Apart from that, I don’t think there are a lot of TV shows that discuss ‘privilege’. Kudos to the writers for highlighting this aspect.

The photography is really pretty. It, like TEOTFW, has a consistent tone, which is even reflected when Mae and George are in bed. Note the beautiful blue shadow. The music is nice. The costume looks comfy and lovely (never let the costume steal the show– I’m talking to you, Killing Eve). My favorite, as I said earlier is the pace of narration. Mae has run a lot and it is a signature of Feel Good, like Fleabag’s looking at the camera.

Feel Good is about a female stand-up comedian. In the States, there is The Marvelous Mrs Maisel. Both Mae and Midge suffer from a backfire from they using real-life stories with their partner (judging from S1 finale, haven’t watched S2 yet). It is interesting to think how personal the stand-up mateials can be, but having just watched Hannah Gadsby’s Nanette, I am reminding myself that in order to make things funny, the ‘truth’ can be compromised. While Nanette is almost metafictional when Hannah approaches/disconstructs what makes comedy, I don’t think that is the angle Feel Good is heading towards. However, it is still fit to think about the show amongst the powerful works by Mae Martin’s fellow female comedians. The freshness of the show also reminds me of Girls (with its minute depictions of modern female life) and Fleabag (with its candidacy about real emotions). Feel Good deserves more recognition and PLEASE CAN WE HAVE SEASON 2 THANK YOU NETFLIX!!

#换命真相#《换命真相》如果生命重来一次的话，你会试着如何重新来过？真相到底是什么？你如何确定这是你第一次重生，还是已经不是第一次？你到底想要怎样的结局，你要重来多少次？还是，一切只是愧疚已久的安慰？时光与张旻不管如何相识，命运总是让他们爱上对方。很爱你，更想可以保护你，像守护天使一样。朴宝剑与欧阳家纯不知不觉爱上你的纯真杨紫山与刘星打闹擦出爱花火我一直疑惑，这到底是时光真的时光倒流回100天前，让他重获一个改变命运的机会，可以挽回自己的爱人和亲人，还是另有原因。真相到底是什么？而我，有一个大胆的想法，一切并没有什么重生，只是时光太过愧疚与难过幻想出来的，而朴宝剑是他的好朋友，为了安慰他，把他的幻想写成书。

【详细】

13969508

如今的电影工业早已让战争片的场面达到了二十年前无法想象的境界，但《大决战三部曲》、《血战台儿庄》这些8、90年代的作品却依然被誉为国产战争片的巅峰，这其中的原因，尽在这部国庆档大作之中。

三个小时篇幅还原长津湖战役，本来绰绰有余，但编导团队在追求视觉效果和主旋律情绪的方针下，却把战役简化为了战斗。恢弘的战场实景拍摄的确能让三个小时转瞬即逝，但看完后你会发现，对于长津湖这场抗美援朝最惨烈战役的全貌，你的印象依然是模糊的。

如果你看过十年前八一电影制片厂的纪录片《冰血长津湖》，就会知道这一战的制胜点在于志愿军利用长津湖的特殊地形，制定的诱敌深入，分而围之的打法。实操中的关键，则在于十万大军以无数战士冻死冻伤的代价，趁夜秘密急行军，分割穿插包围美军精锐。但以上这些，在这部电影中竟然几乎被完全省略，取而代之的是一场游离于主线之外的通讯塔之战。编剧宁愿强行插入几场怀念大哥，抑或是该不该对敌人补刀的尴尬文戏，也不愿多做一些战略层面的铺陈和解析。一两句旁白和北极熊团长一句“他们是从天上来的吗”，就潦草带过了志愿军在此战中最可歌可泣的部分。也许只能解释为，拍摄部队行军的效果，远不如真刀实枪的战场精彩吧。

一部对题材失去宏观把控的作品，对于作品本身的整体把控也注定失败。所以在主线战事拍完后，五分钟内竟出现了柯大川、杨根思和史密斯将军三个不同视角的段落——前两个更是毫无铺垫的大乱入——我竟也并不意外。有佳句无佳章的观感，在结局突然到来之前早已定型。没有《大决战》等经典之作中对待重大战役的宏观严肃视角，制作再精良，明星再扎堆，场面再刺激再精彩，也不过像是加强版的抗美神片，过个眼瘾罢了。哪怕中间某些段落的确曾让我热血沸腾，走出影院回味，却发现情绪的立足点似乎并不可靠。几乎通篇以采访和图片形式呈现的《冰血长津湖》里，才有着那一战最真实最动人的全貌。每一个电影版《长津湖》的观众，都值得去重温一遍那部纪录片。