致我这部剧中最爱的cpRULES刷完全剧，真的很喜欢朱尔斯和鲁这对。她们之间的感情可以说是全剧中最特别的。朱尔斯和鲁之间有过不少亲密的行为，经常抱在一起睡觉，会亲吻，会彼此告白。她们之间的爱纯粹无邪，大概也是目前剧里唯一没有做过的一对cp，这也说明了她们之间关系的特殊性。就如玛迪所说，亲吻更加糟糕，因为它比做爱更加亲密。THE FIRST

鲁第一次吻朱尔斯。当时两人因为网友的事闹

致我这部剧中最爱的cpRULES刷完全剧，真的很喜欢朱尔斯和鲁这对。她们之间的感情可以说是全剧中最特别的。朱尔斯和鲁之间有过不少亲密的行为，经常抱在一起睡觉，会亲吻，会彼此告白。她们之间的爱纯粹无邪，大概也是目前剧里唯一没有做过的一对cp，这也说明了她们之间关系的特殊性。就如玛迪所说，亲吻更加糟糕，因为它比做爱更加亲密。THE FIRST

鲁第一次吻朱尔斯。当时两人因为网友的事闹了小矛盾，鲁主动去朱尔斯家求和好。在鲁声泪俱下的“控诉”中，两人抱在了一起重归于好。她们额头碰在一起，朱尔斯对鲁说： “我厌弃世人，唯独喜欢你。”

【详细】

13506442

故事框架其实，有一些类似《囚犯医生》。

被意外诬陷，因为医疗事故，不得不改行重来的前医生。这一部在医疗诉讼，到底应该如何看待医生这一职业；《囚犯医生》聚焦监狱中的医疗体系弊端，包括保外就医，中止服刑。

切入点都是好的，也能给与观众很多信息量，和不同的观点。但不管是反转不停欲罢不能的剧本

剧情美观！有个好好的风帆，演技好，好像真实的一面，，好好好好，非常好，非非常常常好，爱情方面演到一流，让观众看到入迷不睡，眼睛定神地看着这戏，好像个让人上引一样，一不看总是不舒服，晚上失眠，总是想着这戏。心不志定，神不可回，真是一部好看的戏啊，人心不回，让人醒不到来，总是要看，看着入神

电影的前40分钟，我看到的是对女主种种行为的不解.抽烟，主动搬进男主的家同居，和猫女打架，仿佛这个女孩就是一个叛逆不自爱的缺爱的负面形象.男主的性格是非常平静的，真正被抛弃过的人，反而会更加不动声色，因为他们害怕再次被抛弃，所以会小心翼翼.如果我是男主，我也会选择不告诉女主，男主对女主的爱是无私的，我不能给你一辈子的幸福，那么我，祝你幸福，那么我就找到那个能够让你幸福的人代替我，即使我心

电影的前40分钟，我看到的是对女主种种行为的不解.抽烟，主动搬进男主的家同居，和猫女打架，仿佛这个女孩就是一个叛逆不自爱的缺爱的负面形象.男主的性格是非常平静的，真正被抛弃过的人，反而会更加不动声色，因为他们害怕再次被抛弃，所以会小心翼翼.如果我是男主，我也会选择不告诉女主，男主对女主的爱是无私的，我不能给你一辈子的幸福，那么我，祝你幸福，那么我就找到那个能够让你幸福的人代替我，即使我心痛，我不舍，我做出违背职业道德的事.在我生命消失之前，我都会尽全力让你幸福.

而女主，一开始我真的认为女主有点喜欢男二，毕竟现代人的爱情，真的是爱来得太快.让我感动的，真正落泪的是女主对男主的爱情.女主应该是打从一开始就决定和男主一起走向死亡的.她早就知道了，所以，为了你，为了能让你能安心得死去，我愿意，我愿意违背良心，去和一个我不爱的人做爱结婚，假装自己爱上了他.如果还有更多的时间，我想女主是不会去牺牲男二的.十几年的感情，自己生命的唯一就要永远消失了，女主要控制自己的情绪都需要拼尽全力，我是真的没有力气去管别人的死活了，爱情本来就是自私的，女主对男主才能无私，每个人对于自己所爱的事物才能无私.你先走吧，反正我随后就来了，我不知道有没有下辈子.但这辈子我要的那个人，一直都是你.所以，没有你，我的人生也停止了.

是男主和女主教会了男儿和女二什么是爱情，告诉了女二这世上是有爱情的，是有以爱情为首位而活着的人的，教会了男二，如何长久得爱自己的所爱，爱不是简单的东西，是为对方拼尽全力，乃至耗尽生命的东西.

这世上哪里都有爱情，但这世上有太多自己为的爱情，祝愿你拥有爱情，哪怕死亡都无法将你们分开.

【详细】

10047894

原载于 《看电影·午夜场》2017年第11期：

2017年6月7日，反映二战期间“类人猿”行动的电影《刺杀盖世太保》在法国公映。两年以来，这已经是“类人猿”行动被第二次搬上银幕。 “类人猿”行动究竟事出几何？为什么会如此频繁地成为电影题材？不同版本的相关电影与真实的历史之间，又有怎

原载于 《看电影·午夜场》2017年第11期：

2017年6月7日，反映二战期间“类人猿”行动的电影《刺杀盖世太保》在法国公映。两年以来，这已经是“类人猿”行动被第二次搬上银幕。 “类人猿”行动究竟事出几何？为什么会如此频繁地成为电影题材？不同版本的相关电影与真实的历史之间，又有怎样的异同？让我们回到1942年的布拉格街头，再看这段血雨腥风的历史。

经久不衰的银幕热点

1942年5月27日，在德军占领下的捷克斯洛伐克首都布拉格，英军支持下的捷克斯洛伐克流亡政府军与抵抗组织，执行代号为“类人猿”的秘密行动，刺杀了德国党卫军上将莱因哈特·海德里希。他也是反法西斯阵营成功刺杀的军衔最高的德军军官。

如此传奇的刺杀行动，自然是电影的优良题材。1943年4月，流亡到美国的著名德国导演弗里茨·朗，以其为题材的电影《刽子手之死》（Hangmen Also Die!）公映。不过，为了实现更为戏剧性的惊险效果，这部影片与史实存在不少出入。1943年6月，同样是流亡到美国的德国导演道格拉斯·塞克，以其为题材的电影《希特勒的疯子》（Hitler's Madman）公映。1946年，捷克斯洛伐克制作了相关题材电影《无翼之人》（Men Without Wings）。1960年，捷克斯洛伐克制作了电影《最高原则》（Vyssí princip），以“类人猿”行动之后，德军的恐怖统治为题材。1964年，捷克斯洛伐克制作了电影《刺杀海德里希》（Atentát）。1976年，美国拍摄电影《拂晓攻击》（Operation Daybreak）公映。2011年，捷克制作了以德军对“类人猿”行动进行报复的利迪策惨案为题材的电影《利迪策大屠杀》（Lidice）。2013年，捷克制作了电视电影《射向海德里希的子弹》（Kulka pro Heydricha）。2016年，捷克隆重推出了电影《“类人猿”行动》（Anthropoid）。2017年，法国上映了电影《刺杀盖世太保》（HHhH）。其电影名称，来源于法国小说家洛朗·比内的历史小说《希姆莱的大脑名叫海德里希》（Himmlers Hirn hei?t Heydrich），缩写为“HHhH”。

至此，“类人猿”行动已经被十次搬上银幕。不过，其中不少影片非常老旧，缺乏观影资源。对中国观众来说，1976年—2017年的几部相关电影，会更为熟悉。

英俊的“恶魔”

十次进入银幕的“类人猿”行动，有着宏大的历史背景。

1938年，希特勒统治的法西斯德国，吞并了奥地利。随后，他又以保护德意志族人为借口，要求占领捷克斯洛伐克的苏台德地区。1939年9月29日，为了避免卷入战争，英国与法国牺牲了捷克斯洛伐克的利益，与德国签署了《慕尼黑协定》，希特勒如愿以偿。1939年3月，德军又占领了捷克斯洛伐克全境。希特勒将其一分为二，捷克沦为“波西米亚与摩拉维亚保护国”，斯洛伐克沦为“斯洛伐克共和国”。捷克斯洛伐克总统爱德华·贝奈斯率领政府与部分武装力量流亡英国。1939年9月1日，德国入侵波兰，第二次世界大战全面爆发，捷克斯洛伐克正式进入反法西斯阵营。

二战爆发前，捷克斯洛伐克是仅次于美国、苏联、德国、英国、法国与意大利的世界第七大工业国，工业总产值甚至高于日本与西班牙。1939年3月—1941年9月，德国外交官康斯坦丁·冯·诺伊拉特负责管理捷克斯洛伐克。德国非常重视捷克斯洛伐克的军事工业基础，并以其为德军源源不断地补充武器装备。德军无法容忍捷克斯洛伐克抵抗组织的破坏行动。德国秘密警察组织“盖世太保”首脑海因里希·希姆莱与德国国家安全总局局长莱因哈特·海德里希，都认为诺伊拉特的统治手段太“宽容”，才导致了恶果。希特勒随即任命海德里希代任“波西米亚与摩拉维亚护国公”。海德里希上任后，以血腥手段进行统治，捷克斯洛伐克陷入恐怖。海德里希对此颇为得意，经常坐着司机驾驶的敞篷轿车，在布拉格街道上招摇过市，以显示自己对恐怖统治效果的信心。

以往关于“类人猿”行动的电影，往往是从反法西斯阵营的角度进行讲述。《刺杀盖世太保》却破天荒地在电影前半段，讲述了海德里希的“发迹史”。实际上，真实的海德里希，要比电影中的角色更“优秀”。他身高1.85米，外表英俊，记忆力超群，学生时代已是“德智体美劳全面发展”的“好学生”，精通小提琴、钢琴、滑雪、游泳、骑术、帆船、飞行、击剑与射击，是田径十项全能与现代五项全能选手，先后担任过国际刑警组织主席与国际击剑组织主席。同时，他个性又极为残忍，指挥过作为纳粹内部清洗冲锋队的“长刀之夜”行动，为灭绝犹太人制定过“最终解决方案”，因而获得了“铁石心肠的人”、“金发野兽”、“刽子手”与“布拉格屠夫”等绰号。

在《刺杀盖世太保》中，海德里希夫人莉娜·冯·奥斯滕，也有了较为详细地描绘，不至于像在以往相关电影中那样“跑龙套”。诚如电影讲述的那样，奥斯滕是海德里希接触纳粹的“领路人”，海德里希与她订婚后，确实因为之前曾与某造船厂厂主的女儿有染，产生婚恋纠纷，而丢掉了在德国海军的职位。但是，海德里希结识奥斯滕并非像电影中那样是在舞会上，而是在帆船俱乐部，奥斯滕溺水，海德里希救了她的性命。他们相识时，奥斯滕只有19岁，而不像电影中女演员的年龄那样大。

【详细】

94112928

这个导演比较不走寻常路，通常这种悬疑性质很大的电影，导演都会回避特别清楚地回答观众疑问，他反而在各种访问、活动一一回答了大部分问题。

以下两个链接说得很清楚了：

这个导演比较不走寻常路，通常这种悬疑性质很大的电影，导演都会回避特别清楚地回答观众疑问，他反而在各种访问、活动一一回答了大部分问题。

以下两个链接说得很清楚了：

https://variety.com/2018/film/awards/hereditary-ari-aster-answers-burning-questions-1202841448/

And the fact the family is completely unaware adds to the terror.One way that I pitched the film when I was first taking it out was “it’s a story about a long-lived possession ritual told from the perspective of the sacrificial lamb.” Ultimately we are with the family in their ignorance of what’s really happening. But I also wanted to imbue the film with this sinister, more knowing perspective. Even though we are with the family in their ignorance, the movie itself knows exactly where the story is going. And everything is inevitable. Throughout the film, things are just sort of clicking into place and all those things are driving this family towards one end.

In an early scene, the subject of free will is discussed. Are you saying this family has no free will?Yeah, absolutely. I see the film as being very Greek in that sense. This is absolutely inevitable, the family has absolutely no agency.

There is nothing Annie can do to stop this from happening?No, I don’t think so. That’s where the dollhouses came in. Annie creates these miniature figures and dollhouses and they served as a perfect metaphor for the situation; they’re dolls in a dollhouse being manipulated by outside forces. Any control they try to seize is hopeless.

Is that why she thinks she can stop it by burning the Charlie’s sketchbook – the first time she tries, she catches fire — but the second time, her husband Steve catches fire?Exactly. Even that scene is meant to play as Annie’s big redemptive moment, she’s going to sacrifice herself for her son. It’s a beautiful gesture but part of the cruel logic of the film is it’s an empty gesture. Ultimately, it’s not her choice to make. She thinks there’s a design here and she can end things if she sacrifices herself. But there’s no design and there are no rules. There is a malicious logic at play.

Could it have been prevented if she hadn’t been tricked into casting the spell given to her by Joan?The thing is, that scene is ultimately a red herring, and it’s a piece of misdirection. It plays as a séance scene but really it’s a much darker conjuring and they need Annie to take part in it in order to bring it in the house and in order to further this ritual along. When she invites it in, she escalates things. But it would’ve happened anyway, we’re just seeing how it happened. We’re seeing one of the ways it could play out.

There’s a lot of talk about what a bad mother Annie’s mother was. Did she just have kids for the purpose of this ritual?That’s pretty much what is suggested. If you listen to Annie’s speech at the group therapy, there are a lot of keys in her monologue as to what came before this and how far back this goes.

Early on, Charlie cuts the head off a pigeon and makes a strange figurine out of it. Can you elaborate on that?I don’t want to be too obvious but we find later that Charlie has been building these figurines to populate a diorama she’s been building that serves as a shrine to Paimon. It also functions as a metaphor for what Paimon is doing to this family. If you look at the diorama you’ll see they’re headless figurines bowing to a pigeon-headed creature with a crown on its head, which is not far away from what we’re left with in the last scene of the film.

Annie talks about how her mother got “her hooks” into Charlie at an early age. Are we meant to think Charlie is in on it?Charlie is the first successful host for Paimon. It’s transferred from Charlie to Peter at the end.

Because Paimon wants a male body?Exactly.

Is there ever a Charlie or is she Paimon from the moment she’s born?From the moment she’s born. I mean, there’s a girl that was displaced, but she was displaced from the very beginning.

In an odd way, that makes me feel better.(Laughs) That’s nice. See, it’s a happy ending. But obviously, there’s a boy who’s horribly displaced by the end.

http://www.vulture.com/2018/06/explaining-the-end-of-hereditary.html

Is Paimon a real thing?He is! Well, real in the sense that if you believe in hell and the Devil, Paimon is an actual entity that people do worship. Across various sources, he is designated as “a great King,” “one of the chief demons,” and “one of the most significant Angelick Rulers.” He pledges intense fealty to Lucifer, and is often rendered riding atop a camel (as we see in the movie).

There are conflicting points of view on whether or not Paimon and the demon Azazel are the same. According to the Black Witch Coven, “He is one of the demonic princes overseeing the four cardinal directions, West being his domain,” which is why Joan (Ann Dowd) and her minions “looked to the Northwest” to summon him in the movie. According to the Joy of Satan Ministries, “Paimon gives the power to influence and control others,” and that seems to scan with how he operates in Hereditary. However, the Ministries also describe the hell king as “full of energy. Loud noises and bright lights tend to make him more active. He is very colorful and very friendly.” Maybe the “party naked” side of him just got left on the cutting-room floor, because that guy seems like a downer.

Related Stories

Toni Collette Gets the Worst Inheritance Ever in HereditaryLet’s Talk About the Scene With the Car in Hereditary

What are the “rewards” Annie’s mom wrote to her about in that note?In the Invocations book that Annie pulls out of her mom’s box of things, a photo opposite the image of Paimon shows a person sitting atop a mound of treasure that says “Riches to the conjurer” in a caption beneath. When Joan speaks to Peter/Charlie at the end and crowns him, she asks Paimon to give her and the other followers “knowledge of all secret things, honor, wealth, and good familiars.” She also asks that he bind all men to them, as the worshippers have bound themselves to Paimon.

Those sound like “riches,” and what with a king of hell being resurrected, being recognized as one of his privileged followers will probably be a lot safer than, well, not. In a description of his abilities, Satan Ministries says Paimon “teaches the arts and sciences” in addition to providing “good familiars and gives one position and honor. He can reveal anything about the Earth and one’s mind.” At least some rulers recognize the necessity of science education!

So is Peter Charlie? Or is Peter Paimon?It’s likely that Charlie never knew she was imbued with the spirit of a king of hell, but as Annie says in her grief-counseling group, her mother got “her hooks” in the young girl from the time she was a baby. (Annie’s mom, Ellen, even insisted on feeding baby Charlie — and one of the miniatures depicts grandma offering the infant her exposed breast — which is probably the most unremarked upon insane thing that happens in Hereditary!) As we learn in the opening eulogy, Annie’s mom had “private rituals” and “private friends,” a lot of which probably revolved around putting Paimon into Charlie.

Clearly, though, the long game was to get Paimon into Peter, since Paimon desires a male host, and Charlie sure didn’t seem like she knew she was a preferred underling of the Morning Star! So Paimon was bound to Charlie, and when that little light flash dissolves into Peter’s limp body after he pitches himself out of the attic window at the end, that’s the spirit entering him. With the transfer complete, Joan seems like she’s ready to let Charlie (in Peter’s body) know about everything that’s been going on, and who she really is.

Remember, too, that Annie’s brother hung himself at the age of 16, leaving a note behind saying that his mother had been trying put people inside of him. Ellen failed to secure her son as a host, and she missed her first shot with Peter since Annie had excommunicated her, so she used Charlie as a temporary vessel until the ritual was able to be completed later on. As Aster told Vulture, “The film is about a long-lived possession ritual that is seen from the perspective of the sacrificial lambs.”

Related Stories

How Scary Is Hereditary, This Year’s Horror Hit at Sundance?Hereditary Director Ari Aster Answers His ‘Upsetting’ Film’s Burning Questions

With that in mind, you can think of the movie’s sinister events as being carried out by an invisible hand, of sorts. That sigil painted above grandma’s headless body in the attic? It’s the actual symbol of Paimon, and it was also carved in the utility pole that tore Charlie’s head off. The leafy bit that Annie brushed off her lip when she was drinking tea at Joan’s apartment? Probably a witches brew of some kind (or another red herring, because by now you’re paranoid!). Peter feeling his throat close up and taking the posture of Charlie’s decapitated body before ramming his head into a desk? His body was being primed for a spiritual takeover. Those scrapbook photos of Ellen wearing a white dress and a veil as she’s being showered with gold coins? That sure looks like a wedding ritual, once you see her framed portrait in the satanic tree house, which has a placard with “Queen Leigh” fixed to the top. Does that mean grandma was spiritually married to her granddaughter and therefore breastfed her husband-grandchild when she was an infant? It seems like it!

Did Annie do any of those weird things — decapitating her dead mom’s body, spying on Peter outside his window — or was it the Paimon cult?Aster told Vulture that, “The audience is supposed to suspect that it might be Annie (Toni Collette), but it is the cult of which Ann Dowd is a very significant part. But you are supposed to feel through the film that there are people on the periphery that are watching this family and are hovering just outside.” Therefore, Annie’s sleepwalking was not resulting in her exhuming bodies and cutting their heads off. It was a red herring! Aster laid a sort of bread crumb trail throughout the whole movie, tipping the audience off that the Grahams were always being watched by associates of Ellen and Joan: the man who smiled at Charlie at Ellen’s funeral, all those “new faces” who mourned her death, the woman waving at Charlie across the street from her school, the person breathing in the dark outside of Peter’s window — all of whom we probably saw naked in the tree house during the finale.

What was with that book setting people on fire?It seems like a safe bet that the book was bound to protect itself. The cult did demonstrate they had a pretty long reach when it came to influencing events, and they even stashed a whole headless body in the Graham’s attic when no one was looking. When Annie tried to destroy the book, it protected itself, but Annie was also essential to completing the possession ritual, so she couldn’t just burst into flames and die. We’ll call that a warning shot by the book.

But Steve (Gabriel Byrne)? He had to get out of the way, and the moment he died, Annie stopped being Annie and started being an agent of Paimon, much like when she channeled Charlie into her own body during the previous seance. When that ring of light flashes over her, that’s Paimon beaming into a new host, as Collette explained to Vulture, “Ari was standing to the side, and he let me watch this person be on fire for a while [laughs] and then he said, ‘Okay. Now, Paimon, the light, is going to enter you.’ We never talked about what that would ever look like or be like. I just did one take and that was it.” And that, ladies and gentlemen, is called acting.

Related Stories

Toni Collette on Hereditary, the Wildest Movie of Her CareerNo Kids Were (Permanently) Hurt While Filming Hereditary

What about Annie’s sleepwalking, then?Go with us on this one. What if the sleepwalking was Annie’s subconscious way of fighting her mother and the ritual? She tried to set Peter and Charlie on fire once before, but snapped out of it, right? And then in the dream we see where she admits she wanted to abort Peter but her mom wouldn’t allow it — and so she tried to force a miscarriage — she screams at him, “I wasn’t trying to kill you! I was trying to protect you!” Somewhere in Annie’s subconscious, she must have known her children were in danger, and just as her brother had to kill himself to escape Ellen’s clutches when he was a teenager, Annie must have known deep down that as long as the kids were alive they were existentially threatened.

As Collette told Vulture, in that moment Annie is surfacing what’s in her subconscious, which “allows the audience to know that this is a kind of murky, not entirely understood, gray area about the safety of her children and the intention behind the creation of them — and how her mother was involved, right? So it’s still not entirely clear, but there is an indication of some concern there.” Annie realizes after it’s too late, though, that she part of that threat, and must die if she wants to protect her kids. But by that point the toothpaste is out of the tube, and it just isn’t going back in.

Are the decapitations part of Paimon-related lore?Not really. Aster added that element himself, and he’s not into explaining why. As he told Vulture, “I think it would be disingenuous for me to give any sort of intellectual answer. I feel like there are a lot of really good reasons and I like all of them, but uttering them kind of robs them of something. But I do like all the things that they might provoke in somebody.” As for Collette, she has formed her own theory about all the rolling heads. “We’re so attached to our bodies, we’re so attached to the brain and the mind. They’re like the control center, and that once you lose that metaphorically, you become nothing, and therefore you are able to give yourself over to this greater force?” Speculate away!

So why did he use Paimon?No special reason, really. Aster said to Vulture that he just didn’t want to deploy Lucifer again, and hey, that’s fair. If you need a more substantial explanation than that — just let it go. Sometimes creepy is enough.