这部电影全程看的我很难受，这难受一部分来自“无聊”，一部分来自压抑迷茫，一部分来自触动。说是“无聊”其实就是不懂，我知道在讲述了什么但我看不懂，所以片子的内容对我而言很无聊，没有吸引力。我承认我的思想境界不高，无法企及这部片子的高度。哦，好吧，这一点也无需我承认，因为它是事实。我一度看不下去，但凭借着对芭乐的喜爱我还是坚持看了下去。然后看着看着，我突然我现我的眼角湿润了——我找到了共鸣。虽然那份共鸣很短很短，只是全影片中一个小小部分(在这之后我又回到了又压抑又“无聊”的状态)，但这份共鸣，这份触动，足够我评三分及三分以上了。我想，经历过迷茫期，或者正在经历迷茫期的人，多多少少都会在这部片子里找到共鸣。这共鸣或长或短，有些甚至在你未察觉之时，便悄然而逝。迷茫，是我现在正处于的阶段。电影里的男主角最终找到了答案(呃，或许没有？我也不知道)，但我没有，我依然在迷茫我以后该做什么，该干什么。我无比痛恨着现在自甘堕落的自己，但我仍沉迷于虚幻然后在偶尔的清醒中鄙视自己。所以这部电影看的我很压抑，电影所释放的感受激起了我对自己的痛恨，唤醒了被我强压下去的迷茫，让我很难受很难受。这些所有的看起来很矫情做作的感受让我决定给这部电影四颗星，最后一颗，献给贝尔。

说是在韩国遭到了抵制，好奇心促使更要看一看，南北朝鲜意识形态对立背景下的故事。看前半部分的时候我妈问我哪个是好人哪个是坏人，下意识说主角是好人，但是转念一想，难道一定要将大同江一号拿下的李康武组长就是坏人吗？好与坏在这部剧里似乎很难界定，意识形态斗争下，政治斗争下，唯一能肯定的，要牺牲30几个无辜学生性命以保守政治交易秘密的部分权术分子不是什么“好人”。

在这样的背景下，身为北韩间谍的林守护，和身为南韩高官女儿的殷英路的爱情，注定是个悲剧吧。但是比起他们之间的感情线，更打动我的是林守护在从守护信念到被信念抛弃后反抗这个过程中的执着、坚守、失望、选择、挣扎。这部剧让我看到了丁海寅的演技，不仅可以完美演绎温暖的角色，也能够hold住这样铁血、冷峻的角色，并且从这样的角色中，依然可以看到温暖清秀的一面。BE的时候好难过呀，被母亲抛弃，被养父抛弃，被劳动党抛弃，最终只是一颗棋子。就像剧中他自己说的，“如果我是一个平凡的年轻人，那天我会约你的，那么我们，应该会成为恋人，也一起去游乐园，一起看电影，就这样尽情，想和你待在一起……但是我不后悔遇见你，让冰冷的我开花的英路，非常感谢你！”

在格拉瓦看了预告和剧照。简直就是辣眼睛啊。天了这是什么狗东西。还叫电影？男主角.导演.编剧.纸片.后期.一个人。男二号.摄像.是一个人。女二号.化妆是一个人。外加两朋友。五人组个班子。极度不负责任，和极度低级省钱。造就这绝对是个极度大烂片。看了猫眼还请了水军说是史诗片，绝对史诗大烂片！看着那面饼脸僵尸，vj素材网下载的素材都能丢在电影里。还弄一大堆。还有那五分都不值的ae特效。还号称搞笑恐怖片！搞笑？那叫瞎闹吧.这绝对是任何网络平台都不会要的烂片。你以为电影市场是你这些纸片人来买奖票的地方啊！不过这也是现状。花钱买个奖，花钱上个院线。找个领导开个单子最后上上tv，要个铺贴赞助。忽悠老百姓。忽悠下观众。如此恶心。恭喜，咱们只能给你个年度史诗大烂片的称号！拍电影请对得起观众！请认真！请拿出诚意！电影不是几个群众，几个武行。有点小钱就化身成纸片人来瞎搞的。愚弄大众，必然会被大众所唾弃！

年初一，在深夜场定了一张票，一个人坐到散场。

与其夸赞画面震撼，音画效果之绝伦，举世无双，更使得我称许的是，与一般国产动画所不同之处，《深海》在创作过程中，将关于“原生家庭之殇”的社会性话题融入了动画作品中，通过隐晦的伏笔与抽象的叙事，使幻想与现实中形成工整对仗的互文，这使得其补全了作为一部艺术品所具备的基本素质。当然，可以预见的是，社会性话题的出现以及艺术化程度增高，必然会引发舆论的反弹——立场不同，经历不同，感受不同的人们各抒己见，最终会形成多极对抗的局面。作为一种大胆的尝试，对于话题所引入的铺垫性的欠缺，脸谱化，呆板僵硬，手段粗糙等等问题，也一定会成为被批判的点，然而其无损作品本身的立意和追求。

这部作品，即使放眼世界也是顶流作品。相信随着时间的推移，各大顶级奖项会纷涌而至为其加冕，而在那之前，我对大家的最真诚的建议，就是一定要去电影院看，这是一部典型的为大荧幕制作的电影，丰富的颜色和庞大的海洋，只有在通过银幕才能感受到那种震撼的力量。这是一部足以载入国产动画影史的作品，这种历史性的时刻，不应错过。

下面，我就深入浅出的阐述一下电影的一些元素及其所引发出的涟漪效应。

Feel Good is a low budget 6-episode TV show which mysteriously skipped my attention when it was first brought up by a friend: probably because it features no big star (Lisa is one, but in a small role), and British TV shows like Fleabag and Killing Eve have raised the bar very high now.

However, one night, I started to watch the first episode and was very impressed. The not so sub plot of addiction is so well-written. I really like it when Mae (its main character shares the same name with the writer and lead actor, which is a bit confusing) expands the definition of ‘addiction’: ‘it’s all the same feelings, craving, and withdrawl, and relief, and obsession. We are just swapping one addiction for another’. By doing that, Mae Martin (I will use the full name when referring to the creator) connects the love story and Mae’s struggle to stay clean together. Mae Martin challenges the audience to view addiction as not only a struggle among a group of people, but something many of us face when being in a toxic relationship with partners, or, say, social media. By then, I am convinced Feel Good is quite good because the creators know ‘nuances’. Its focus on addiction also reminds me of Killing Eve S2, the key word for its 2nd season is ‘obsession’. While both handle compulsive/toxic feelings between people/people and object, Killing Eve’s take on obsession is disappointing, Feel Good, on the other hand, only gets better episode by episode.

Story aside, I am mesmerized by how the show introduces the love story to the audience. It is fast-paced. As Guardian remarks, ‘Feel Good moves so quickly and lightly that it seems impossible it could also be managing to construct characters and burrow into psyches as deeply and empathically as it does.’ You never need to fast-forward; it’s densely-packed but you won’t feel stressful; the plots mingle effortlessly. It takes 30 seconds for Mae and George to fall in love with each other. I love how unconventional and unapologetic it is. I love how an LGBTQIA (bless Joyce) story focus on how the two lovers enjoy their relationship (at least for the most part) without giving too much attention to how they are unsure if the other is into them, or suffering from loneliness because they can’t find a partner. Of course the loneliness issue exists and there is suffering, but there are many representations of those already. Feel Good shows how the relationship can be the start, rather than the ending, of a story.

I also like how the struggles of Mae and George are more about themselves making choices than them being in disagreement with a suffocating society. It is refreshing to see not only Mae’s parents, but George’s mother, support their sexuality. Mae’s gig pals don’t make a fuss about her having a girlfriend. The roommate Phil is an angel. The lead of the support group is a gay man; Lava is loved by her mother regardless of her sexuality. While Binky’s husband and his friends are ‘piece of shit’, I don’t see them as homophobic (I could be wrong though). The show demonstrates that everyone can and should be nice to LGBT+ community. I like how Feel Good doesn’t use societal approval as a trope; instead, it allows us to see Mae and George as individuals who make their own decisions. Yes, sexuality is and will be important in their lives, but they don’t let it to devour them, they can still breathe.

The relationship is beautifully written and wonderfully performed. I mean THE CHEMISTRY!! Yes there is sex. As Mae Martin said, she didn’t want the lesbian sex to be voyeuristic. I congratulate her in doing a fantastic job!! Feel Good has amazing sex scenes: they are romantic, witty, hilarious, and honest. The director and writers make sure the sex scenes are not about sex/lust only, they are also about female pleasure. Mae and George communicate and share their sexual preferences; they don’t force their fetish on the other, instead, they ask politely. The show doesn’t mystify lesbian sex: even lesbians can’t cum and that’s ok! Feel Good has achieved what Sex Education has done: it has educated people (older than high schoolers) how to have sex, and more importantly, how to discern when the relationship is going south.

There are nudity scenes and they are (quite literally) serving the plot: it is when Mae feels most vulnerable physically. The paradox of the physicality and the personality is, however, not restricted to gay people. Mae is struggling because she believes however hard she tries, she can never have George in the long haul because George is ‘culturally straight’. George, however, insists this idea is just in Mae’s head. (Or is it?) It becomes apparent that the couple is not on the same page on many things. Mae is shy but she wants public validation of their relationship: she wants to be blessed by George’s family and friends. George is popular (win the lottery) but she is ultra private when it comes to Mae. She points out her friends just want to crack a joke and emotions (mind, not sexuality), for them, is gross. Eventually, George will have to face her own real emotions. There is a moment where Mae questions why George never like/retweet her social media stuffs. As Fleabag says ‘Hair is everything’, the (non)usage of social media, I argue, is (almost) everything. This again shows the discrepancy between the couple – which, of course, is normal; in every relationship/friendship, such disagreements happen and that’s what makes this show so relatable.

It is interesting to note that the dynamic between the two flows all the time. I find myself on the side of Mae and then I am on George’s side! For example, the first episode shows Mae concealing her addiction history from George, which is a bit dishonest; but George also makes Mae think she’s already mentioned her to her friends while actually she’s dating some Crenshaw dude. I find it especially interesting that while George is portrayed as a cold person (she leaves Mae alone in a party; she’s rather cold towards Phil etc etc), Mae can also be quite aloof – check what she does to Lava. When she says let’s not share this with Maggie, it is as if George were saying let’s not tell my friends now.

Talking about George and her friends, I really like how the show does about their friendship. It shows that those friendships, even though ‘long haul’, are not necessarily genuine. Indeed, things can be tricky, if not scary, when friends finally choose to be honest with each other, right?

Binky’s husband and friends are hilarious characters, but the show makes sure not all the male characters are caricatured. I like Phil a lot; he’s giving me the neighbor who ended up marrying Hannah’s boyfriend’s sister in Girls, especially when he’s mentioning all the baby stuffs. Mae’s dad is a charming character; but I am not sure if he’s a good dad. His ‘Oh I need to check the garden’ is a specimen of dad type, who leaves all the dirty job of communicating with kids to mums. The show also inserts in a MeToo story plot where things turn sour quickly. In all, the portrayals of male characters are multifaceted. Well done.

Last but not the least: small roles. Does the show even have small roles? Because everyone shines. Even the shop assistant of that sex shop: the scene is so funny and captivating. Lisa Kudrow is funny but in a cold way – which is really nice. I am not crazy about her first appearance in the laptop; seeing her appear in Blackpool is a real surprise for me (and Mae). I love the scene in Ghost Train the most. Arguing in a horror house/moving train, with all the noise and terrifying man-makes while discussing ‘real emotions’, which is the most terrifying of all – what a genius idea!! The fact that the show keeps vague about why Mae is cast out of the family is an interesting one; I quite like how her mother points out her privilege and that she has everything she wants when she grows up. Again, the show is looking at the mysterious and intricate human mind that is not so easily explainable. Apart from that, I don’t think there are a lot of TV shows that discuss ‘privilege’. Kudos to the writers for highlighting this aspect.

The photography is really pretty. It, like TEOTFW, has a consistent tone, which is even reflected when Mae and George are in bed. Note the beautiful blue shadow. The music is nice. The costume looks comfy and lovely (never let the costume steal the show– I’m talking to you, Killing Eve). My favorite, as I said earlier is the pace of narration. Mae has run a lot and it is a signature of Feel Good, like Fleabag’s looking at the camera.

Feel Good is about a female stand-up comedian. In the States, there is The Marvelous Mrs Maisel. Both Mae and Midge suffer from a backfire from they using real-life stories with their partner (judging from S1 finale, haven’t watched S2 yet). It is interesting to think how personal the stand-up mateials can be, but having just watched Hannah Gadsby’s Nanette, I am reminding myself that in order to make things funny, the ‘truth’ can be compromised. While Nanette is almost metafictional when Hannah approaches/disconstructs what makes comedy, I don’t think that is the angle Feel Good is heading towards. However, it is still fit to think about the show amongst the powerful works by Mae Martin’s fellow female comedians. The freshness of the show also reminds me of Girls (with its minute depictions of modern female life) and Fleabag (with its candidacy about real emotions). Feel Good deserves more recognition and PLEASE CAN WE HAVE SEASON 2 THANK YOU NETFLIX!!

受众太窄，大人不会想看。孩子因为西游记这个背景想看的年龄层又很有限。这个版本也没有那么好看和《西游记》有联系，联系度大约有1%，我甚至觉得编剧可能完全没读过《西游记》，这样才能有足够的胆量完全架构编一个霍格沃茨魔法学校的故事。2022年12月华联观影，主要是这个电影太扯了根本没有一点关系完全不好看只是给三岁小孩看而已，演的根本不到位

非影评，只是有感而发的碎碎念。

看这部电影的时候想到了年初那几张京郊大雪中人们排队的照片，感慨生活不易。拿电影中的剧情和背景对比中国超一线城市的职场人生活，女主也许算是略微幸运的。我自己刚步入社会一年就被鞭打到推翻之前很多认知，改变很多想法，在还没有孩子房子车子的年纪快速地认识到生活的不容易，看社会新闻时那种感受跟上学的时候也很不一样，工作以来那种无力感是更深的，不仅不能改变什么，甚至自己想逃避也无处可逃，一步错步步错，经验的积累主要靠一次又一次吃亏。观察已婚已育甚至有好几个孩子的职场前辈，我对未来的生活感到恐惧，因为前辈尽管在事业上已经如此成功，也无法平衡家庭和事业，我加班的时候也会想，做他的小孩也不容易，爸爸都见不到几次，可是他像打仗一样的生活也已经是有老婆还有长辈在兜底，如果是他一个人带两个孩子，肯定是更加无法兼顾，世俗意义上的家庭事业都很好的成功人士尚且如此，好歹有房子车子有家人，如果是什么都没有的年轻人呢，每次想到都对未来不寒而栗，如果普通人过得好肯定是做过取舍，要么放弃理想，要么在家庭和婚姻中妥协，要么就是降低对阶层和生活质量的要求。就像对孩子的陪伴和事业上的追求，无论有没有人帮忙，就是没法两全的。然而在我们国家的语境下，只提事业和家庭甚至是很残忍的事情，因为除此之外还可能碰上烂尾楼、所在行业被完全打击甚至彻底摧毁、法律上的极端不公、系统性的毫无办法的事情，以及各种随机碰到的糟糕事情，这些似乎都等着在人濒临崩溃的时候再来踢上一脚。还能怎么办呢，只能苟延残喘尽量做好准备，迎接艰难的现代人生活。

2021年5月13日 西门庆贪图潘金莲的美貌，利诱王婆帮他得到潘金莲。武大郎捉奸时被踹中吐血倒地不起。潘金莲在王婆和西门庆的唆使下，联手灌毒害死了武大郎。武松为给哥哥报仇，杀了潘金莲血祭兄长，并砍下西门庆的头颅手刃亲仇。

故事主要围绕西门庆、潘金莲、武大郎、武松四人展开，首先就是选角，丁海峰饰演的武松虽然年纪大了点，但一如过去的干练，拍起打戏眼神凌厉、动作干净利落，可除了丁海峰，印象深 其他人演 无这个味道 红海行动 人民的名义 一身正气 。

潘金莲的扮演者张熙媛，虽然颜值身材都不输曾经的扮演者，但是气质和之前有很大不同，打扮上也刻意迎合现代男性的喜好，又是露脖子又是露腿，衣服还是透视深V，随时都是一副香汗淋漓的场面。现代审美 迎合市场。就角色而言，可怜二字，被迫嫁给武大 因为地主阶层的打压，追求自己爱情却不得，被广大男人定义为水性杨花。

潘长江演武大郎，我给导演组竖个大大的拇指，人物形象抓的真准，没有人比长江更适合了，因为看的小品的人物性格也差不多。